WORLD BANK SAFE MOTHERHOOD INITIATIVE
by Jean M. Guilfoyle
The lives of women and children in developing countries have been measured
and found wanting in the utilitarian cost-benefit analyses of the World
Bank and its partners in the international population control cartel. The
burden and expense of mothers and infants can only be relieved through the
legalization of abortion surgeries and the imposition of restrictive
population control policies at the national, state and local levels.
Programmatic population programs must therefore be injected into their
communities, homes and personal relationships.
An "interagency partnership" composed of the World Bank, the United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP),
the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Fund for Population
Activities (UNFPA), International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) and
the Population Council (PC) have proposed a "Safe Motherhood Initiative"
centered on the legalization of abortion within all national maternal and
health programs in developing countries. Within the partnership, the World
Bank is intended to provide economic compulsion and guaranteed funds to
carry out the agenda forcefully. There are those among the targeted nations
who dare to call this "economic blackmail with genocidal intent. "
Pressures were mounted to impose the "Safe Motherhood Initiative" on Latin
American countries during recent conferences held in Guatemala, the Andean
Sub-region, Mexico and the Caribbean. A strategy session of the major
international participants was held in March at the World bank headquarters
in Washington, D.C. The Guatemalan "Safe Motherhood Initiative" reveals the
Machiavellian pattern of the strategy.
Safe Motherhood Conference, Guatemala
The "Central American Conference for Maternity Without Risk," was held in
Guatemala during January 1992. It was co-sponsored by the World Bank,
Family Care International and local IPPF affiliates. At that conference the
Bank proposed that Latin American countries make the legalization of
abortion the center of their maternal and infant health programs. Before an
audience of health officials and legislators, it was suggested that
"national consultations" should be initiated to bring this about in all
social sectors, especially among women.
Under the deceptive slogan of "Safe Motherhood," it was said that large
monetary savings would accrue if maternal and child health programs in both
the public and the private sector were oriented toward "safe abortion" and
Raising the spectre of maternal deaths as the motivating factor for
legislative change by the 10 Hispano-American government representatives
attending the conference, the Bank compared the costs related to death,
which varies from $1,336 to $1,554, to the social and economic costs of
abortion and contraceptives which would vary between 50 cents and $2.00 per
capita. The Bank was especially concerned about establishing programs that
would guarantee the reduction of maternal mortality as it related to
A cost benefit analysis of the Mexican Social Security System was presented
which showed that for each dollar spent in family planning services between
1972 and 1984, during which intensive sterilization programs were
implemented, $9 was saved on maternal and infant health services.
As a further backup to the Bank statements, a study on "Public Hospitals in
Developing Countries" was offered which found conditions relating to
pregnancy and birth were the major reasons for hospital admissions and
accounted for 13-24 percent of health budgets. The Bank warned ominously
that "closing your eyes and not putting into effect new policies which
concern abortion and maternal health could affect economic progress."
According to Bank calculations, a widely disseminated program of legalized
abortion and contraception, and a change in attitudes toward women, would
only mean an expense of 1 percent of the gross national product. Such a
program would not only save lives but also millions of dollars.
Anne G. Tinker, a health specialist in the Bank's Population and Human
Resources Department, formerly Chief of the Health Services Division of the
U.S. Agency for International Development, opined that "unwanted
pregnancies or those that were not planned imply grave monetary
'Pushing the envelope' of credibility, Tinker said the cost of treatment
for complications of illegal abortion, according to studies made by the
Bank, "means four times the expenses of prenatal care, 12 times the cost of
a normal delivery and, in some hospitals of the region, 50 percent of the
She urged the compilation of field studies on cost-effectiveness in
maternal health programs, to be funded by the World Bank. Such studies
would be used as foundations for public policy in the region.
Family Care International (FCI), a U.S.-based organization which for
several years shared the offices of the International Planned Parenthood
Federation (Western Region) and Profamilia in New York City, insisted that
abortion is one of the principle causes of maternal death because of the
legal restrictions that exist in almost all the Latin American countries.
Although FCI qualified its statements with an admission that no reliable
figures were available on the number of induced abortions, they claimed
nevertheless that between 3 and 4 million abortions are performed annually
in Latin America.
The delegation of the Population Council of the U.S. and Mexico called on
specialists to discuss strategies for an analysis of abortion in Mexico.
Lucy Atkins, representative of the U.S. funded Population Council has
already been conducting studies on this for over a year ("La Jornada," 3
March 1992, "Legislate on Abortion the World Bank Proposes to 10 Latin
After the Guatemalan conference, Mexican officials--led by Senator Blanca
Esponda, president of the Committee on Population and Development of the
Mexican Congress--presented legislative changes on population policies for
discussion by the Mexican government. The group called on Mexican public
officials to revise abortion legislation in Mexico. They also proposed that
both the executive and the legislative branches of Mexican government work
jointly to determine how 'modernized' population programs can be
strategized within all sectors of society, including the churches (Ibid).
Senator Blanca Esponda is a member of the Global Committee of
Parliamentarians on Population and Development and the Global Forum of
Spiritual Leaders and Parliamentarians on Human Survival. Both groups
operate out of the offices of the United Nations Social and Economic
Council in New York City.
The Global Committee of Parliamentarians was organized by UNDP, UNFPA,
UNICEF and IPPF in 1982 to promote integral development, especially in
areas of population (and) the environment. The Global Forum is composed of
members of the Global Parliamentarians and world spiritual leaders
organized by an international interfaith group, the Temple of
Understanding. The Global Forum seeks spiritual leaders who "rise above the
dogma of religions" who have "the courage to question established ideas,
doctrines, techniques and assumptions" ("Shared Vision," No. 3, 10 and No.
7, 16, Global Forum of Spiritual and Parliamentary Leaders on Human
World Bank Meeting, Washington, D.C.
World Bank President Lewis Preston was joined by James Grant of UNICEF,
Mahbub ul Haq of UNDP, Hu Ching-Li of WHO, Nafis Sadik of UNFPA, Halfdan
Mahler of IPPF and George Zeidenstein of the Population Council for the
"partnership" meeting at the World Bank headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Claiming that "'Safe Motherhood' means better lives for all women,
children, families and future generations," partnership members ignored
the devastating effects on women of contraceptive drugs, sterilizations and
abortion surgeries, and promised more of the same for the world's women
(tape recording of World Bank Meeting, 9 March 1992).
They erected the Rousseauean 'fear of death' as the motivating passion
needed to drive "mothers previously doomed to die" toward acceptance of
government-sponsored 'choices.' In a discussion concerning the developing
nations, Lewis Preston, president of the World Bank, stated, "Each year
some 500,000 women die of pregnancy-related causes...more than a quarter of
all deaths among women of reproductive age in many developing countries are
maternal deaths." In fact, statistical data collection in the developing
nations is notoriously unreliable. Activities are therefore based on
statistical 'best estimates and 'projections' which are subject to the bias
of the presenter.
Preston's solutions included "Advocacy, research, and increasing the
quality and accessibility of maternal health (integrated with) family
planning services." "Effective family planning" (rather than reliable
health care) is the first line of defense against maternal death." "Trained
midwives, centers equipped for obstetric complications and transport to
those centers" provided the secondary line of assistance for women.
Third World women would bitterly dispute these feigned interests in women's
health and well-being. Speaking at the recent World Women's Congress for a
Healthy Planet in Miami, Dr. Mira Shiva, an internist with the People's
Health Network and Health Action International, was notable for her
objections to the use of population control technology in India. Dr. Shiva
claimed that money is not being spent on comprehensive "health services."
It is actually being spent for "family planning programs." While diseases
are increasing, money spent on family planning programs "is eclipsing or
removing what could have gone into basic health programs" (Tape recording,
World Women's Congress for a Healthy Planet, 8-12 November 1992, Miami).
She continued, "In areas where women have a high rate of illiteracy, more
and more coercive methods, and more and more complicated technologies" are
being used. Long acting injectibles, such as RU 486, which effect ' the
pituitary, hypothalamus and create fertility and menstrual disorders for
women are being brought in as 'do it yourself' in our part of the world."
"This is not for the liberation of women....It becomes evident that the
women's health issues are not the important issues ...national population
policies are going to be linked with financial aid....We are in a position
where things are being dictated...one of them is population policy....Where
women are concerned the only time they are taken into account is when their
tubes are to be ligated."
Lewis Preston, as president of the World Bank, conformed to Dr. Shiva's
predictions that national population policies would be linked with
financial aid when he promised to integrate the full "Safe Motherhood"
agenda into World Bank "policy dialogue" with developing countries.
"Policy dialogue," within the lexicon of the World Bank, consists of
"informal contacts with the top leaders, project negotiations,
monitoring...and institutional development" as requirements for developing
countries negotiating World Bank loans (see "Population Research Institute
Review," Vol. 1, No. 4, "World Bank Population Policy: Remote Control," 8).
Dr. Shiva's expectations were fully realized in the closing commentary of
the World Bank press release when Preston integrated population policy
requirements as the primary provision of basic survival needs. "The Bank,"
he stated, "expects that its lending for the Population, Health and
Nutrition (PHN) sector will approximately double to $2.5 billion by 1995."
James Grant of UNICEF stressed the need for "women who contemplate
motherhood" to be "healthy, well-nourished and well-informed" and insisted
that "couples bring only wanted children into the world (emphasis in the
original), preferably when the mother is between the ages of 18 and 35,
with adequate spacing between each birth...." "In the long run", he said,
"prevention is the way to go."
In the past, UNICEF has argued vehemently that it was not involved in the
issue of abortion but, on this occasion, the organization openly
acknowledged "active participation" in a partnership which advanced
abortion surgeries as an integral part of its "Safe Motherhood" campaign.
James Grant reminded those attending the partnership meeting of the World
Summit for Children where "71 heads of state and government and senior
representatives from another 88 countries..." committed themselves and
their countries to a 'Plan of Action' in which "Safe Motherhood must be
promoted in all possible ways." He expounded the UNICEF program further:
Additional leverage for advocacy and programmatic action is provided by the
Convention on the Rights of the Child which...is now the law of the land in
110 countries. This extraordinarily comprehensive 'Bill of Rights'...also
obligates States parties--in Article 24--'to ensure appropriate pre-natal
and post-natal health care for mothers.' In other words, what we Partners
for Safe Motherhood have been focusing on as needs have now been elevated
to the level of rights by the international community and formally
recognized as priorities by the leaders of the world (emphasis in the
Halfdan Mahler of the International Planned Parenthood Federation opened
his presentation with a quotation from Genesis, "Unto the woman He said, I
will multiply thy sorrow. In sorrow shall thou bring forth children."
"Even the Safe Motherhood Initiative is considered a hot potato because it
brings to the forefront the "A" word....I submit that the provision of safe
abortion services deserves much greater attention....In many parts of the
world, sex is the poor woman's only asset (emphasis not in the original),
to be used in exchange for cash for school fees--or a meal for her
children...(attention to these risks in women's lives)...of course includes
very high quality contraception and safe abortion services" (Tape recording
of World Bank Meeting of Partners for Safe Motherhood in Washington, D.C.,
press copies of addresses by Mr. Louis T. Preston, James P. Grant and Dr.
Mahbubul Haq, World Bank press release).
The "Day of the Jackal" is at hand.