There Was No Cover-Up
In response to the New York Times article
Transparency, firmness and severity in shedding light on various cases of sexual abuse committed by priests and religious: are the criteria that Benedict XVI has been pointing out to the whole Church with constancy and calmness.
It is a way of operating — consistent with his background and with his more than 20 years as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith — which is obviously feared by those who do not want the truth to come out and by those who would prefer to exploit, on no grounds, dreadful episodes and painful events that in some cases date back several decades.
The latest example of this is the story published today in the American daily The New York Times, together with a comment on the serious case of the priest Lawrence C. Murphy, who abused deaf children, in a Catholic Institution where he worked between 1950 and 1974. According to the article's reconstruction of the facts, based on the abundant documentation provided by the lawyers of some of the victims, the reports on the priest's conduct were only sent to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith — of which Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was Prefect and Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone Secretary — in July 1996 by the then-Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland of Milwaukee in order to obtain instructions concerning the correct canonical procedure to follow. The request did not in fact refer to accusations of sexual abuse, but to the violation of the Sacrament of Penance perpetrated by solicitation in the confessional, which happens only when the priest induces the penitent to commit a sin against the Sixth Commandment (can. 1387).
It is important to observe — as the Director of the Press Office of the Holy See said — that this canonical query presented to the Congregation was in no way connected with a potential civil or penal procedure with regard to Fr Murphy: against whom the Archdioceses had moreover initiated a canonical procedure, as is evident from the same abundant documentation published online by the New York daily.
The Congregation answered the Archbishop's request with a letter signed by Archbishop Bertone on 24 March 1997, with instructions to proceed in accordance with what the Crimen sollicitationis (1962) establishes.
As can easily be deduced from reading the reconstruction by the New York Times, there was no cover-up in the case of Fr Murphy. And this is confirmed by the documentation attached to the article in question, including the letter that Fr Murphy addressed in 1998 to the then-Cardinal Ratzinger, asking that the canonical procedure be interrupted because of his seriously bad health.
In this case too the Congregation answered, through Archbishop Bertone, inviting the Ordinary of Milwaukee to put into practice all the pastoral measures provided by Canon 1341 in order to obtain reparation for the scandal and the establishment of justice.
This end is indisputably reaffirmed by the Pope, as his recent Pastoral Letter to the Catholics of Ireland demonstrates. Yet the prevalent tendency of the media is to disregard the facts and to put a spin on interpretations in order to spread an image of the Catholic Church as though she were solely responsible for sexual abuses, an image that does not correspond with reality. And which, on the contrary, obviously serves the ignoble intention to succeed at all costs in blaming Benedict XVI and his closest collaborators.
Weekly Edition in English
31 March 2010, page 16
L'Osservatore Romano is the newspaper of the Holy See.
The Weekly Edition in English is published for the US by:
The Cathedral Foundation
L'Osservatore Romano English Edition
880 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 777
Baltimore, MD 21203
Phone: (443) 263-0248
Fax: (443) 524-3155
Provided Courtesy of:
Eternal Word Television Network
5817 Old Leeds Road
Irondale, AL 35210