DATE OF THE BIRTH OF CHRIST
(Summarized from E. L. Martin, "The Star that Astonished the World," ASK
Publications, Box 25000, Portland Or. 1991)
(1) The date of the birth of Christ hinges on just one thing, the statement
of Josephus (Antiquities 17.6-8) that Herod died shortly after an eclipse
of the moon. Astronomers supply the dates for such eclipses around those
years: None in 7 or 6 BC. In 5 BC, March 23, 29 days to Passover. Also in 5
BC. Sept. 15,7 months to Passover. In 4 B.C. March 13, 29 days to Passover.
3 and 2 B.C. no eclipses. In 1 BC. January 10, 12 1/2 weeks to Passover.
(2) Josephus also tells what events happened between the Eclipse and the
Passover (cf. Martin pp. 85-87).They would occupy probably about 12 weeks.
Martin also, pp. 99-101 shows that the eclipse of Sept. 15,5 BC could not
fit with known data, especially the fact that Herod was seriously ill in
Jericho (over 800 feet below sea level) when the eclipse happened - but
Jericho was a furnace of heat at that time, Sept. 15. Herod would not have
stayed there when he could have had the much better climate of Jerusalem.
But if the eclipse was in midwinter - Jan. 10--Herod would find Jericho
(3) We know from an inscription from Paphlagonia in Asia Minor - cf.
Lewis and Reinhold, Roman Civilization, Source Book II, pp. 34-35 - that in
3 BC all the people took an oath of allegiance to Augustus. The same oath
is also reported by the Armenian historian Moses of Khorene, and by the
later historian Orosius.
(4) Augustus was to receive the great title of Pater Patriae on Feb. 5,
2 BC. So the actual governor of Palestine, probably Varus, would have had
to go to Rome for the festivities, and since sailing on the Mediterranean
stopped about Nov. 1, and did not resume until Spring, he must have gone in
the early fall of 3 BC. But Quirinius was nearby, had just finished a
successful war against the Homonadenses. So he was left as acting Governor.
Luke does not use the noun governor, but the participle, "governing".
(5) There is an obscure decade in history, 6 BC to 4 AD, as Classicists
readily recognize. Yet this period is important, including the time when
Tiberius was absent from political life at Rome, being at Capri. It is hard
to fit the events of this period into place if we make the birth of Christ
early as is commonly done. But if we put it in 3 BC the difficulties are
over. For example, we know Augustus received his 15th acclamation for a
major victory, won by one of his generals, around this time. If we pick 4
BC for the death of Herod, we cannot find a victory to warrant the
acclamation, which came in 1 AD. But if we put the birth of Christ in 3 BC,
then the war would be running at about the needed time, and finished in 1
Objection: a) Josephus says Herod had a reign of 37 years after being
proclaimed king by Romans, and had 34 yrs. after death of Antigonus, which
came soon after Herod took Jerusalem. b) Further, his 3 successors,
Archelaus, Antipas and Philip started to reign in 4 BC. So Herod died in 4
Reply: a) That calculation would make death of Herod actually in 3 BC,
not in 4 BC - scholars have to stretch the date to 4 BC, since no eclipse
of moon happened in 3 BC. - But, Herod took Jerusalem late in 36 BC (on Yom
Kippur in a sabbatical year, so well remembered - and Josephus says Pompey
had taken Jerusalem in 63 which was 27 yrs. to the day of Herod's capture
of Jerusalem). Using the common accession year dating, we see Herod started
his 34 years on Nisan 1 in 35 BC, and those years would end on Nisan 1 BC.
So 34 years after 35 BC yields 1 BC for death of Herod after eclipse of
Jan. 10.--b) As to the 3 successors, Herod lost favor of Augustus in 4 BC,
on a false report, was no longer "Friend of Caesar", but "Subject".
Antedating of reigns was common - reason here was to make the three seem to
connect with the two "royal" sons, of Hasmonean descent, Alexander and
Aristobulus, whom Herod executed on false reports from Antipater (do not
confuse with Antipas).
The Star: In the evening of June 17, 2 BC, there was a spectacular
astronomical event in the western sky. Venus moved eastward seemingly going
to collide with Jupiter. They appeared as one star, not two, dominating the
twilight of the western sky in the direction of Palestine. This conjunction
had not happened for centuries, would not happen again for more centuries.
Jupiter was considered the Father, Venus the Mother. Ten 19 days later, on
August 31st. Venus came within .36 degrees of Mercury. On Sept. 11 came the
New Moon, the Jewish New Year. This happened when Jupiter, the Kin planed
was approaching Regulus, the King star. Further, there were three
conjunctions of Jupiter and Regulus within the constellation of Leo, the
lion which was considered the head of the Zodiac. Now Gen. 49:10 had
foretold there would always be a ruler from Judah, whom Jacob called the
lion, until the time of the Messiah. Leo was dominated by the star Regulus,
which astronomers called the King Star. The Magi, being astronomers and
astrologers, would surely read these signs. (The three conjunctions with
Regulus were Aug. 12, 3 BC; Feb. 17, 2 BC, and May 8/9 2 BC).
Also, on Dec. 25 of 2 B.C., Jupiter stopped for 6 days over Bethlehem.
This is a normal motion for Jupiter, it stops twice, and reverses its
seeming movement. This may have been the very time the Magi came with their
gifts. This was also the time of the Hanukkah festival, during which it was
customary for Jewish Fathers to give gifts to their children.
Martin thinks the birth of Jesus was in September 3 BC, and the
probable date of the Magi was Dec. 25, 2 BC.
More than 600 planetariums here and in Europe have revised their
Christmas star show to match this work of E. L. Martin.