Previous Question Next Question
   
re:Ken Hacket
Question from kay on 10/28/2013:

Dear Ms Brown:

You indicated that it is the corruption of the bishops that allowed Ken Hacket to be accepted in Rome.

Couldn't the current Pope have refused to accept him as ambassador, as well as past popes refused to allow him to sit on the Pontifical Council Cor Unam, if Mr. Hacket's actions have been grossly incompatible with Catholic doctrine? Doesn't this suggest that the popes have been corrupt?

Answer by Judie Brown on 11/4/2013:

Kay

First of all, the Pope probably has no idea how corrupt the CRS became under Mr. Hackett's supervision. He was there for 40 years and made a lifetime occupation out of deception. The bigger question is why did the Bishops on the CRS Board not instruct Obama that Hackett was unfit for the task and prohibit him from accepting the post?

Judie

COPYRIGHT 2014

Click here to send this Question and Answer to a friend                    

Previous Question Next Question


News Blog From the Vatican by Joan Lewis


Back to topics list.

 

HOME - EWTNews - FAITH - TELEVISION - RADIO - LIBRARY - CHANNEL FINDER WATCH ONLINE - FAQ - EWTNKids
WHAT'S NEW - EWTN MOBI - GENERAL - RELIGIOUS CATALOGUE - PILGRIMAGES - PRESS ROOM - ESPAÑOL

Terms of Use      Privacy Policy      Contact Us

EWTN Global Catholic Network
5817 Old Leeds Rd., Irondale, AL 35210 USA 1-205-271-2900