Interview With Monsignor Livio Melina of the Lateran University (Part
I)ST. PAUL, Minnesota, 18 MARCH 2004 (ZENIT).
A leading professor and
administrator of a pontifical university says that he likes what he sees
at some Catholic educational institutions in the United States.
Monsignor Livio Melina, vice president and professor of moral theology at
the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family at the
Lateran University in Rome, recently visited the John Paul II Institute in
Washington, D.C., and the Center for Catholic Studies at the University of
St. Thomas here.
He told ZENIT about the strengths he sees in U.S. educational programs and
how he hopes to maintain and bolster the tradition of Catholic higher
education in Italy and Europe....
Q: What is the state of Catholic higher education in Italy? in Europe?
Monsignor Melina: Generally speaking, we have a very good tradition of
education in Europe, grounded in our humanistic background. Usually, the
system of education in Italy and Europe has been more humanistic and
broader than in the United States. But the United States has an advantage.
It has the possibility to take into account more-specialized interests for
each person within the system. Instead, in Europe we emphasize lectures by
professors rather too much.
There is something new in our culture
some problems in Italy and Europe in the system of education. I think that
the actual situation and condition can be described in two main features.
The first is that we have a kind of separation between instruction and
education. That means that little by little we are losing our great
tradition, substituting our interest for the person in his globality with
an interest only in giving some specific information. The consequence of
this is the second feature I want to emphasize
the
fragmentation of culture.
Fragmentation means having a very deep interest in particular issues
without having a vision of the whole of reality. There is so much emphasis
on positive sciences, and more and more of these sciences are only
emphasizing a particular field of specialization. But we are losing the
broader context of knowledge in which also the sciences can be understood
in their particular contribution to the human condition.
Q: Why is it important for the Church to continue to invest in and support
Catholic higher education?
Monsignor Melina: In Italy there is a priest who has dedicated his life to
education in schools and universities. His name is well known also in the
United States
Luigi Giussani [founder of Communion and Liberation].
He said that the Church can lose everything but not the charge and the
mission to educate the person
since for the Church, the person is the supremely important issue. The
formation of young people should be the main concern of the Church because
to form the person is really to give to the world a new actor in its
history.
I agree with Monsignor Giussani, that the mission to educate young people
is so intrinsically connected to the mission of the Church, to
evangelization and to catechesis, that the Church must take the mission of
education as its principle and fundamental task.
Q: What have you learned from your visit to universities in the United
States?
Monsignor Melina: I've been getting to know the Center for Catholic
Studies at the University of St. Thomas for only a short time. But from my
contacts with the director of the center, and with the graduate and
undergraduate students, I have appreciated very much the center's intent
to put the formation of young people in the broader context of humanistic
formation of the person.
I like very much the program of studying major works of poetry and
literature. I also appreciate the center's effort to present a very
integral program of formation rooted in spiritual care for the person.
I think these kinds of programs of education are very important for
overcoming the difficulties that I mentioned before
the
difficulties of the separation of education from instruction and the
fragmentation of
knowledge. The unity of the person is very important.
I think that education is always a question of freedom and a question of
heart. It is grounded in the relationship between each person and the
figure of the educator. We are given very good witnesses about our faith
and an integral presentation of the Christian ideal of life, not only
simply in the spiritual way, but in a cultural way
in
a way in which all of the mentality of the person is shown to have roots
in the faith.
We have in this specific relation between the disciple and the educator
the two essential poles of education.
Q: How do you hope to make changes in the Italian system so that it will
be more integrated?
Monsignor Melina: I think that an essential gift we have at the John Paul
II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family at the Lateran University
in Rome is the gift that we have among the professors
a
real communion of persons rooted not in a sentimentality, but in a common
sharing of the vision of the life and the a common method for comparing
the content of Christian Revelation with human experience.
I think that this method of formation, the ongoing comparison between the
content of Revelation and human experience, is the condition for a real
Christian culture. Culture arises always when the life of the person makes
contact with the Revelation
a
new light and a new form of life can begin from this meeting.
I hope that this contact, this friendship, this exchange of students and
professors between our two centers
each one with its own mission in the Church
can
be very fruitful for both centers.
Q: Why is it important to have facilities such as Marriage and Family
Institutes or Centers for Catholic Studies and Italy in other European
countries, particularly in the face of growing secularization there?
Monsignor Melina: When our Holy Father John Paul II founded the Institute
for Studies on Marriage and Family he was worried and preoccupied above
all about the situation of marriage and family in the Western world. He
saw the crisis of Christian morality inside marriage and the crisis of
families.
He understood that to overcome this crisis, it's not enough to repeat some
moral norms. What was needed also, and above all, was to deepen a
theological anthropology, the foundation of Christian life.
Twenty-three years after the foundation of the institute, we can say that
the crises that prompted John Paul II to found the institute are now more
real, more living, because the challenges are much bigger.
We have now not only the crisis of moral norms or crisis of marriage or
families, but we are losing the meaning of the sexual difference
the
importance of sexual difference for the unique identity of each person.
ZE04031820
Interview With Monsignor Livio Melina of the Lateran University (Part
II)
ST. PAUL, Minnesota, 19 MARCH 2004 (ZENIT). The Church's moral theology
must focus on the integral liberation of the human person, not just on
norms, in order to respond to the crisis of modernity.
So says Monsignor Livio Melina, vice president and professor of moral
theology at the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family
at the Lateran University in Rome.
Here, Monsignor Melina dealt with how John Paul II has shown the direction
that a renewal of moral theology should take....
Q: What is the greatest challenge facing moral theology today?
Monsignor Melina: During a big congress in Rome last November, Cardinal
Ratzinger said that the most important task of moral theology in the
present time is not to present an organic set of moral norms but above all
to deepen the mystery of the synergy between divine and human action.
Human action is a deep and real mystery in which God and man cooperate
toward our final destiny of the divinization of the human person; this is
the goal of our lives.
I think it is very important to understand the reason for the Church's
interest in morality. The Church is not the guardian or servant of moral
norms. She is above all the community in which the integral Christian
experience can be the renewal of human life.
The interest of the Church in morality is an interest in the integral
liberation of the human person. If we doubt that moral action is coherent
with the faith, we are losing the meaning of our daily lives, our daily
tasks.
I think the main concept of moral theology is to reappropriate the mystery
of action. I think that the crisis of the last decades is rooted precisely
in the loss of this mystery.
When you look at human action only in a utilitarian way, you see human
action primarily as an event that happens in the world and only that can
change the state of affairs in the world.
You are tempted to measure the value of human action only by weighing and
calculating the proportion between the good and the evil that can derive
from human action. Or, you are tempted only to measure human action in a
very exterior way with moral norms.
Obviously such norms are important and necessary to human life -- they are
a help to us to verify our relationship to Christ. But they are not the
main issue of Catholic moral theology.
Catholic moral theology, in order to be faithful to the task it has in the
life of the Church, must consider a much more broader context of
reflection.
When the encyclical "Veritatis Splendor" spoke about the crisis of morals,
it outlined two main features. The first is the separation between the
freedom and truth, and, second, the separation between faith and morality.
The encyclical put its finger right on this crisis.
When freedom is without reference to truth, freedom is only an arbitrary
power over the world, not in agreement with our profound vocation.
When morality is not rooted in the faith, faith becomes something not
useful for the world, and morals become some external commitment without
the proper roots that can nourish the life of the Christian.
Q: What has been John Paul II's most important contribution to moral
theology?
Monsignor Melina: On the one hand, we can say that his main contribution
is to always put the original human experience in relationship with
Revelation. This happens in order to establish the kind of correspondence
by which Revelation can be understood in a specifically human way, and
human experience can achieve its ultimate illumination, its ultimate
meaning.
The second field of contribution is the wonderful body of catechesis in
the Wednesday audiences, in which the Holy Father proposed the theology of
the body in a very original and new way. It is a real root for Catholic
sexual moral theology.
After these, there's his contribution of "Veritatis Splendor" in the field
of fundamental moral theology. The Holy Father not only answers some big
problems of moral theology today, but also shows moral theologians the
direction for a renewal of moral theology.
I think that the main contribution the Holy Father makes to the
understanding of Christian human action is to have shown, first of all,
the personalistic context of human action.
That means that human action is action between persons and action in which
the person constructs himself or herself [while] acting. It's the
personalistic concept of action. Secondly, Pope John Paul II gives us the
theological context of Christian action. Christian action is to share in
the action of Christ.
The Holy Father also has made a major contribution in the field of the
social teaching of the Church, which is also part of moral theology.
When the Holy Father speaks about the personalistic meaning of work, when
he speaks so profoundly about topics of peace and justice in the world, he
makes very precious and very pertinent contributions to understanding the
context in which we live. ZE04031921
|
