| Watering dry places and illuminating dark ones
The feast day of one of the Doctors of the Church
—
St Bernard of Clairvaux, the 12th century mystic and reformer
—
falls on 20 August. The text which follows by Fr Paul Murray, OP,
Professor of Spiritual Theology at the Angelicum University in Rome, is
a shortened and amended version of a paper originally published as "The
Word into Words: 'Grace and Truth' in St Bernard of Clairvaux",
Communio: International Catholic Review, Vol. XXVIII, n. 1,
Spring 2001, pp. 3-25.
Mystery into Words
What is it like, in
practice, for a human being really to experience God in this life? Is an
experience of this kind possible? And, if so, are there signs by which
we can tell if the experience is genuine or false? And, when it is
genuine, can it be described? And is it wise, in any case, to try to
communicate something of this experience to others with whom we're
speaking about God or to whom we're preaching? Is such experience not
something that is attained only by a few rare contemplatives in this
life? And is the task of the preacher, then, simply to proclaim certain
truths about God
—
the central dogmas
—
but, for the rest, never to attempt to speak out of any kind of personal
faith-experience?
In this context it is
interesting to note a statement made by Pope John Paul II in Donum et
Mysterium: "The minister of the Word", he wrote, "must
possess and pass on that knowledge of God which is not a mere deposit of
doctrinal truths but a personal and living experience of the Mystery".
Experience
—
the word "experience"
—
may seem like a rather obvious word to use
in this context, even a necessary word. But, for a good part of the 20th
century
—
let us say the first thirty or forty years
—
the majority of Catholic theologians tended to avoid using the term.
They did this largely because of its associations with Modernism, and
because of the Modernist tendency to set up, over against the authority
of tradition, and against even the great common statements of faith and
dogma, the authority of individual religious experience. Since the
middle of the 20th century, however, and certainly since the time of the
Council, there has been a significant return by teachers in the Church
and by theologians to an earlier, more confident use of the word
"experience".
(a) Bernard and "the book
of experience"
Of all the great Doctors of
the Church, Bernard of Clairvaux, the 12th century mystic and reformer,
is probably the one who uses the term "experience" most often, and uses
it to the greatest effect. Speaking, for example, of what happens when
an individual believer has received, in profound depth, the grace of the
Spirit, and has become "wholly aflame with divine love", Bernard states
that "then God is indeed experienced". But Bernard goes on at
once to say that, even here, God is not experienced "as he truly is" (i.e.
not in his inmost being), "a thing impossible for any creature".
Bernard is well aware that at least as challenging as the question of
experience, is the question of the communication of experience. And yet,
in Sermon 74 of his Commentary on the Song of Songs, he is clearly
intent on trying somehow to talk about what he calls "the wisdom hidden
in the mystery". But how can he do it? How can such an infinite mystery
be contained in mere finite words? How can he, an individual believer,
and a limited human being, presume to preach the mystery?
In answer to those among
his brethren and friends, who had asked that he share with them
something of his own interior life and experience, Bernard says: "[Y]ou
force me to walk in great matters and mysteries which are beyond me.
Alas! how afraid I am to hear the words, 'Why do you speak of my
delights and put my mystery into words'? Hear me then as a man who is
afraid to speak yet cannot remain silent". Having made this statement in
Sermon 74 of his Commentary, he continues: "Now bear with my foolishness
for a little. I want to tell you of my own experience, as I promised.
Not that it is of any importance. But I make this disclosure only to
help you, and if you derive any profit from it I shall be consoled for
my foolishness; if not, my foolishness will be revealed. I admit that
the Word has also come to me
—
I speak as a fool
—
and has come many times".
What, in effect, Bernard is
proposing to do here is to preach the Word of God by relating to his
brethren something of his own individual experience of the Word. That
experience carries with it a certain authority, of course, but not one
that can be compared, obviously, with the authority of the Word in
scripture. The contemplative experience is, at root, always a response
to a visit from the Word. In this unique drama of love, it is the Word
which takes the initiative, and the human heart which responds. And so
the experience, when it is authentic, can be thought of almost as an
echo of the Word, or even a cave for the Word in which to echo, a place
or space that welcomes the Word with living faith and with love. But it
is not the Word itself.
(b) The Visit from the Word
When St Bernard attempts to
describe something of his own mystical or contemplative experience, he
acknowledges, first of all, what was not involved in the experience.
Thus he writes: "The coming of the Word was not perceptible to my
eyes". Even at the moment of vivid encounter, when the Word is utterly
present to Bernard, that presence appears somehow both elusive and
strangely intangible.
"Although he has come to
me, I have never been conscious of the moment of his coming. I perceived
his presence, I remembered afterwards that he had been with me;
sometimes I had a presentiment that he would come, but I was never
conscious of his coming or of his going. And where he comes from when he
visits my soul, and where he goes, and by what means he enters and goes
out, I admit that I do not know even now... I have ascended to the
highest in me, and look! the Word is towering above that. In my
curiosity I have descended to explore my lowest depths, yet I found him
even deeper".
What Bernard discovers in
contemplative prayer, is that
—
this side of paradise
—
no human thought, no human feeling, can comprehend the mystery of God.
But here there is a question that must be faced: if God's presence is so
elusive and mysterious, how is it possible for the contemplative ever to
speak about it, or even to know if the experience itself has actually
taken place? This question Bernard wisely anticipates. He says: "You
ask, then, how I know he was present, when his ways can in no way be
traced?". St Bernard answers by speaking not of an immediate experience
of God, but rather of experience at another level. He begins to share
with us, in fact, some of the discernible effects of God's
presence on his own interior life, effects which are both moral and
spiritual. What we are being allowed to glimpse, then, with the help of
St Bernard, are the signs of an amazing love: vivid, shining traces of
the mystery of grace: "[A]s soon as he enters in, he awakens my
slumbering soul; he stirs and soothes and pierces my heart, for before
it was hard as stone, and diseased. So he has begun to pluck out and
destroy, to build up and to plant, to water dry places and illuminate
dark ones, to open what was closed and to warm what was cold; to make
the crooked straight and the rough places smooth, so that my soul may
bless the Lord, and all that is within me may praise his holy name".
Obviously, the coming of
the Word brings with it enormous blessing. And so, it is natural to ask
if there is some way we can prepare ourselves to receive from God such a
gift. Bernard, in his answer to this question, doesn't talk about the
need for new or novel methods of prayer or meditation. Instead, he
speaks simply about two very down-to-earth realities: "good works" and
"the practice of the virtues". Bernard even insists at one point that
"the grace of contemplation is never owed except to the commandments".
But Bernard also draws attention, in his teaching, to the vital
importance of the emotion
—
the deep spiritual emotion
—
of desire. God, he says, will visit the soul "provided it is committed
to seeking him with all its desire and love". But why desire? Why is it
so important? Bernard explains: "The fire of holy desire ought to
precede his advent to every soul whom he will visit, to burn up the rust
of bad habits and so prepare a place for the Lord. The soul will know
that the Lord is near when it perceives itself to be aflame with that
fire". According to Bernard, objective instruction alone is no guarantee
of progress in the spiritual life. The commandments and the law must, of
course, be given to us. But the inner heart, if it is really to change,
needs also to be moved, in some form or other, by grace".
Thus, in preparing for the
Word's coming, the first thing of importance, we can say, is action or
the keeping of the commandments. But also important is the drive or the
urgency of an interior desire. Many spiritual teachers and directors
will say that love
—
Christian love
—exists
in action but not in feeling. St Bernard, however, being (I suspect)
uneasy with this rather sharp and extreme either/or distinction,
seeks to establish or to recover what he calls "a middle path". And, in
Sermon 50, he makes bold to declare: "Love exists in action and
feeling". And then goes on to say: "Among the many great and grievous
evils that the apostle ascribes to men I have read this one is reckoned:
to be without affection".
When Bernard experiences
the Word as present in his soul, he is filled with the emotions of
delight and joy. But when the Word suddenly seems to disappear, and all
is darkness again, Bernard's prayer becomes a deep and sustained cry of
sorrow and longing. He writes: "[W]hen the Word has left me, all these
spiritual powers become weak and faint and begin to grow cold... Then my
soul will inevitably be sorrowful until he returns and my heart again
kindles within me
—
the sign of his returning. When I have had such experience of the Word,
is it any wonder that I take to myself the words of the Bride, calling
him back when he has withdrawn?".
For Bernard, part of the
experience of God
—
a major part
—
is, paradoxically, the experience of his "absence". Again and again,
both in life and in prayer, we are
—
or so it seems
—
left completely on our own, bereft of the sense of God. Reflecting on
this fact, Bernard quotes the words of Jesus in John's Gospel, words
intended of course to console us: "A little while and you shall not see
me, and again a little while and you shall see me" (Jn 16:16). But
Bernard is not consoled. With real exasperation he exclaims: "Oh little
while, little while! How long a little while! Dear Lord, you say it is
for a little while that we do not see you. The word of my Lord may not
be doubted, but it is a long while, far too long". As soon as Bernard
loses sight of his divine Lord, he begins to search for him again in
prayer. And, what is more, he begins to speak of this search for God in
a number of his sermons. The effect is truly remarkable, for by speaking
of God's "absence" in this way, by revealing to his readers, and to his
brethren, something of his own spiritual anguish, the reality of God
—
the presence of God
—
is made more palpably real, perhaps, than ever before.
The Preacher of Grace and Truth
To deepen further our
understanding of Bernard's contemplative experience of God, and to gain
some insight into his way of preaching, it will be helpful to take up
and examine two words which St Bernard repeats over and over again in
Sermon 74: the word "grace" and the word "truth".
(a) Bernard and Grace
By "grace", Bernard means
the wonderful experience in faith of coming to know God as "goodness and
mercy", as someone "full of joy and radiance"
—
"festivus et splendidus". It means discovering for oneself God's
great power to soothe and awaken the heart, and it means also perceiving
with contemplative love and with wonder, "the excellence of his glorious
beauty". There can, I think, be no doubt whatever that, in the 12th
century, there was no one more than Bernard of Clairvaux who deserved
the title "preacher of grace". According to his contemporary and good
friend, William of St Thierry, "The force of his preaching began to
shine out especially in the way in which he softened to conversion even
the hard hearts of his hearers, and he rarely came home without a
catch".
God, in St Bernard's
opinion, wants us to "breathe freely", and to be confident in the
knowledge that, when we turn to him in prayer, no matter how great our
sins appear, his kindness is even greater. "Sorrow for sin is indeed
necessary", we are told, "but it should not be an endless
preoccupation". Thus, when it comes to private prayer, "the just man",
Bernard notes, "is not always accusing himself". If, on occasion, he
does so, it is "only in the opening words". But, normally, his prayer
will conclude "with the divine praises". St Bernard sees clearly that it
is never enough to confront the truth of oneself within the courtroom of
private conscience. "As for me", he writes, "as long as I look at
myself, my eye is filled with bitterness. But if I look up and fix my
eyes on the aid of the divine mercy, this happy vision of God soon
tempers the bitter vision of myself'.
(b) Bernard and Truth
St Bernard was not only a
remarkable preacher of grace, he was also a preacher of truth. "The
fullness of grace", he declared, in an astonishing phrase in Song of
Songs, Sermon 74, "does not consist of grace alone". The Word, it is
true, delights to come to us as our redeemer and friend, and even
sometimes, in prayer, as our bridegroom. But, when he comes, Bernard
says, he comes to us as truth as well as grace, as judge as well as
friend. "[B]y the movement of my heart... did I perceive his presence".
There is, first of all, then, an awakening to grace and a profound sense
of consolation. But there is also, Bernard notes at once, an experience
of purification and a new awareness of truth. Things within us, which
are opposed to the new life, are "plucked out", we're told, and even
"destroyed". And the heart that was as "hard as stone and diseased"
finds itself pierced through. "I knew", Bernard says, "the power of his
might because my faults were put to flight and my human yearnings
brought into subjection. I have marvelled at the depth of his wisdom
when my secret faults have been revealed and made visible". Effectively,
what St Bernard is saying here is that if, in prayer, we experience only
and always a sustained series of spiritual consolations and delights,
but never what he calls "the truth of our condition in God's sight",
then what we are experiencing is certainly not God. For this reason, in
Sermon 74, Bernard implores the Word to come to him "full of grace
and truth".
"I need both of these: I
need truth that I may not be able to hide from him, and grace that I may
not wish to hide. Indeed, without both of these his visitation would not
be complete, for the stark reality of truth would be intolerable without
grace, and the gladness of grace might appear lax and uncontrolled
without truth".
Clearly, all that applies
to prayer in this context, applies also to preaching. Bernard is well
aware that, in the hands of the preacher, truth without grace, is a
harsh, fundamentalist weapon. But he is also equally aware that grace
without truth, is a mere sentimentality. "How many people", he writes,
"have received grace without profit because they have not also accepted
a tempering measure of truth? In consequence they have luxuriated in it
too much, without reverence or regard for truth.... To them it could be
said... 'Go, then, and learn what it means to serve the Lord in fear,
and rejoice in him with awe' ".
Fear! One of the most
notable characteristics of St Bernard's spirituality, is that, at every
stage of the spiritual journey, our deepest human emotions
—
fear and desire, sorrow and joy
—
far from being eliminated, are seen to play a vital role in the search
for God. Thus, in the very earliest stages of conversion, even fear can
be used by grace to help us in our awareness of God, and sometimes in a
way that is far more effective, Bernard says, than the knowledge we
receive from books or from a lecture hall. Love is God's very nature,
and so it is clearly not wise to keep thinking of him only as a "judge"
or as a "teacher", or to keep looking for him always at the "bar of
justice" or in "a teacher's auditorium".
Throughout the course of
our spiritual lives, Bernard says, we can expect a "twofold help from
above": the first help we receive is "correction", but the second is
"consolation". He writes: "The first imbues us with the fear of God, the
latter tempers that fear with the joy of salvation". Fear, then,
considered as the beginning of wisdom, is an experience of correction.
But, what comes at the end of wisdom
—
the consolation of union
—
is clearly an experience of quite extraordinary joy and peace, a true
haven of rest. But even then,, it would seem, even as God
pours out his wonderful gifts of joy and rest, he also actively wounds
the heart with love, and "in a way that is wondrous yet delightful, he
teases the awe-struck seeker until he reduces him to restlessness".
Effectively, what this means is that God, as "grace and truth", is
somehow always testing the heart of the one who seeks him. And this
happens even in the very early stages of our conversion.
Sometimes, in the spiritual
life, we like to imagine that, with our
thoughts and feelings, we can reach out and directly, touch or
experience God. But, on the evidence of the Old and New Testaments, our
human "experience" of God, although it does quicken, for a time, real
depths of spiritual emotion, is never as important or as sacred as the
call to loving obedience, for example, or to daily surrender. God is the
one, we have to say, who desires to "experience" us. And thus, when we
encounter his "truth", or when he comes to us as truth, this is not
merely an abstract code against which our thoughts and deeds are being
judged. It is, rather, the reality of a profound touch probing and
testing our hearts. What the Word asks, when he comes to an individual
in prayer, is not, "Do you experience me?" but "Do you love me?",
"Do you keep my Word?", "Do you listen to my Word?", "Do you put it into
practice?".
As we read through
Bernard's homilies, one thing emerges very clearly: an authentic
preacher of the Gospel cannot be a preacher of grace only, or of truth
only. The Word, which Bernard proclaims, and the Word which he
encounters in prayer, comes to him always "full of grace and truth".
Unfortunately, in the actual practice of preaching, there has been a
tendency, in almost every age, to emphasize one aspect of the mystery,
and to ignore the other. Preaching, in the early part of the 20th
century, for example, was characterized by an active and robust
preaching of moral and dogmatic truth. God was the giver of the
commandments, and the upholder of Church law. But, often, there was
little or nothing said about God's prodigal kindness and compassion. In
contrast, preaching in the second half of the 20th century marked a
return to a Gospel emphasis on God's astonishing grace, and to a renewed
focus also on the humanity of Christ. But with this renewal
—
inspired, I have no doubt, by God's own Spirit
—
there was a tendency at times to speak
almost exclusively of the grace of God, and of the mercy of God, but to
say nothing or almost nothing about God's truth or God's law. The end
result was that, for many in the Church, including many young people
listening to school talks on religion or to Sunday homilies, even the
great sacred words such as "grace" and "compassion" began to lose their
salt and their savour.
Once preaching is no longer based on the full Gospel
message, and no longer grounded on what St Bernard calls "inward
experience", then the Word itself becomes somehow debased, and sacred
truth degenerates into mere ideological conviction. On the one hand,
then, we have the extreme proponents of a false rigorism, and on the
other, the no less extreme proponents of what might be called cheap or
easy grace. What I find so enormously impressive in Bernard as a
preacher, is the way he is able to go beyond these opposites. His words
bear the full weight of the mystery of God, the paradox, that is, of a
truth which lets us off with nothing, and of a grace which lets us away
with everything.
Conclusion
What matters finally, for
Bernard, is that all those to whom the Word of God is preached, should
begin to see, or to experience in faith God's true nature. He writes:
"This vision of God is not a little thing. It reveals him to us as
listening compassionately to our prayers, as truly kind and merciful, as
one who will not indulge his resentment. His very nature is to be good,
to show mercy always and to spare. By this kind of experience, and in
this way, God makes himself known to us for our good". Truth, then, is
fundamental to prayer, in St Bernard's understanding, but grace is
essential. The idea or the hypothesis that, at some stage, the Word
might come to Bernard, only "as a judge", but not as a friend,
not as "a bridegroom", that he might come as truth, therefore, but not
as grace, prompts Bernard to exclaim: "God forbid that this may ever
happen!". Bernard, as a preacher, is well aware that "Truth is bitter
unless seasoned with grace". So, in the concluding words of Sermon 74,
he prays that the Word of God would not approach merely "with the stern
gaze of truth", but would enter, rather, "as one who brings peace, joy,
and gladness".
These words of Bernard are
words born of a profound faith-experience. They are wise and sacred
words, instinct with that sure hope which comes from faithful prayer,
and from a profound knowledge of the Word. It is true, of course, that
as a preacher, Bernard tells us he is "afraid to speak". Nevertheless,
again and again, he dares to put "mystery into words". Burdened with the
joyful knowledge of God's nature, he "cannot remain silent". His whole
desire, as a man of living faith, and a humble initiate of the Gospel,
is to proclaim the knowledge of God in Christ, not as "a mere deposit of
doctrinal truths", but rather, to use the expression of Pope John Paul
II, as "a personal and living experience of the Mystery".
|