|
GENERAL AUDIENCE OF WEDNESDAY, 11 NOVEMBER
On Wednesday, 11 November, at the General Audience held in the Paul
VI Hall, the Holy Father resumed his catechesis on the theology of the
body, basing his talk on the discussion between Our Lord and the
Sadducees. Following is the text of the Pope's message.
1. After a rather long pause, today we will resume the meditations
which have been going on for some time, which we have called reflections
on the theology of the body.
In continuing, it is opportune to go back to the words of the Gospel in
which Christ referred to the resurrection. These words are of fundamental
importance for understanding marriage in the Christian sense and also the
renunciation of conjugal life for the kingdom of heaven.
The complex casuistry of the Old Testament in the field of marriage not
only drove the Pharisees to go to Christ to pose to him the problem of the
indissolubility of marriage (cf. Mt 19:3-9; Mk 10:2-12). Another time, it
also drove the Sadducees to question him about the so-called levirate
law.(1) This conversation is harmoniously reported by the synoptic Gospels
(cf. Mt 22:24-30; Mk 12:18-27; Lk 20:27-40). Although all three accounts
are almost identical, we note some differences, slight, but at the same
time significant. Since the conversation is reported in three versions,
those of Matthew, Mark and Luke, a deeper analysis is necessary, since it
contains elements which have an essential significance for the theology of
the body.
Alongside the other two important conversations, namely, the one in
which Christ refers to the "beginning" (cf. Mt 19:3-9; Mk 10:2-12), and
the other in which an appeal was made to man's inner self (to the heart),
indicating desire and the lust of the flesh as a source of sin (cf. Mt
5:27-32), the conversation which we now propose to analyze constitutes, I
would say, the third element of the triptych of the enunciations of Christ
himself: a triptych of words that are essential and constitutive for the
theology of the body. In this conversation Jesus referred to the
resurrection, thus revealing a completely new dimension of the mystery of
man.
Christ refutes belief of Sadducees
2. The revelation of this dimension of the body, stupendous in its
content—and
yet connected with the Gospel reread as a whole and in depth—emerges
in the conversation with the Sadducees, "who say that there is no
resurrection" (Mt 22:23).(2) They had come to Christ to set before him an
argument which in their judgment confirmed the soundness of their
position. This argument was to contradict "the hypothesis of the
resurrection." The Sadducees' argument is the following: "Teacher, Moses
wrote for us that if a man's brother dies and leaves a wife, but leaves no
child, the man must take the wife, and raise up children for his brother"
(Mk 12:19). The Sadducees were referring here to the so-called levirate
law (cf. Dt 25:5-10). Drawing upon the prescription of this ancient law,
they presented the following case: "There were seven brothers. The first
took a wife, and when he died, he left no children. The second took her,
and died, leaving no children, and the third likewise, and the seven left
no children. Last of all the woman also died. In the resurrection whose
wife will she be? For the seven had her as wife" (Mk 12:20-23).(3)
Wisdom and power of God himself
3. Christ's answer is one of the answer-keys of the Gospel, in which
there is revealed—precisely
starting from purely human arguments and in contrast with them—another
dimension of the question, that is, the one that corresponds to the wisdom
and power of God himself. Similarly, the case had arisen of the tax coin
with Caesar's image and of the correct relationship between what is divine
and what is human (Caesar's) in the sphere of authority (cf. Mt 22:15-22).
This time Jesus replied as follows: "Is not this why you are wrong, that
you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God? For when they rise
from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like
angels in heaven" (Mk 12:24-25). This is the fundamental reply to the
case, that is, to the problem it contains. Knowing the thoughts of the
Sadducees, and realizing their real intentions, Christ subsequently took
up again the problem of the possibility of resurrection, denied by the
Sadducees themselves: "As for the dead being raised, have you not read in
the book of Moses, in the passage about the bush, how God said to him, 'I
am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? He is
not a God of the dead, but of the living" (Mk 12:26-27). As we can see,
Christ quoted the same Moses to whom the Sadducees had referred, and ended
with the affirmation: "You are quite wrong" (Mk 12:27).
Another affirmation
4. Christ repeats this conclusive affirmation even a second time. In
fact, he said it the first time at the beginning of his explanation. Then
he said: "You are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the
power of God" (Mt 22:29). We read in Mark: "Is not this why you are wrong,
that you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God?" (12:24). In
Luke's version (20:27-36), on the contrary, Christ's same answer is
without polemical tones, without that, "You are quite wrong." On the other
hand, he proclaimed the same thing since in his answer he introduced some
elements which are not found either in Matthew or in Mark. Here is the
text: "Jesus said to them, 'The sons of this age marry and are given in
marriage. But those who are accounted worthy to attain to that age and to
the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage,
for they cannot die any more, because they are equal to angels and are
sons of God, being sons of the resurrection'" (Lk 20:34-36). With regard
to the possibility of resurrection, Luke—like
the other two synoptics—refers
to Moses, that is, to the passage in Exodus 3:2-6. This passage narrates
that the great legislator of the old covenant had heard from the bush,
which "was burning, yet not consumed," the following words: "I am the God
of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of
Jacob" (Ex 3:6). In the same place, when Moses had asked God's name, he
had heard the answer: "I am who am" (Ex 3:14).
In this way, therefore, speaking of the future resurrection of the
body, Christ refers to the power of the living God. We will have to
consider this subject in greater detail later.
NOTES
1. This law, contained in Dt 25:7-10, concerns brothers who lived under
the same roof. If one of them died without leaving children, the dead
man's brother had to marry his brother's widow. The child born of this
marriage was recognized as the son of the deceased, so that his stock
would not be extinguished and the inheritance would be kept in the family
(cf. 3:9-4:12).
2. In the time of Christ, the Sadducees formed, within Judaism, a sect
bound to the circle of the priestly aristocracy. In opposition to the oral
tradition and theology elaborated by the Pharisees, they proposed the
literal interpretation of the Pentateuch, which they considered the main
source of the Jahwist religion. Since there was no mention of life after
death in the most ancient books of the Bible, the Sadducees rejected the
eschatology proclaimed by the Pharisees, affirming that "souls die
together with the body" (cf. Joseph, Antiquitates Judaicae, XVII,
1.4, 16).
The conceptions of the Sadducees are not directly known to us, however,
since all their writings were lost after the destruction of Jerusalem in
the year 70, when the sect itself disappeared. We get what little
information there is about the Sadducees from the writings of their
ideological opponents.
3. The Sadducees, turning to Jesus for a purely theoretical "case," at
the same time attacked the primitive conception of the Pharisees on life
after the resurrection of the body. They insinuated, in fact, that faith
in the resurrection of the body leads to admitting polyandry, which is
contrary to God's law.
|
