GENERAL AUDIENCE 16 JANUARYIn the course of the General
Audience on Wednesday, 16 January, the Holy Father delivered the following
address.
1. Let us continue today with the analysis of the texts of Genesis,
which we have undertaken according to Christ's line of teaching. Let us
recall that in the talk about marriage he referred to the "beginning."
The revelation, and at the same time the original discovery of the
nuptial meaning of the body, consists in this: it presents man, male and
female, in the whole reality and truth of his body and sex ("they were
naked") and at the same time in full freedom from any constraint of the
body and of sex. The nakedness of our progenitors, interiorly free from
shame, seems to bear witness to this. It can be said that, created by
Love, endowed in their being with masculinity and femininity, they are
both "naked" because they are free with the freedom of the gift.
This freedom lies at the basis of the nuptial meaning of the body. The
human body, with its sex, and its masculinity and femininity seen in the
very mystery of creation, is not only a source of fruitfulness and
procreation, as in the whole natural order. It includes right from the
beginning the nuptial attribute, that is, the capacity of expressing
love, that love in which the person becomes a gift and—by
means of this gift—fulfills
the meaning of his being and existence. Let us recall here the text of the
last Council which declared that man is the only creature in the visible
world that God willed "for its own sake." It then added that man "can
fully discover his true self only in a sincere giving of himself".(1)
2. The root of that original nakedness free from shame, which Genesis
2:25 speaks of, must be sought in that complete truth about man. Man or
woman, in the context of their beatifying beginning, are free with the
freedom of the gift. To remain in the relationship of the "sincere gift of
themselves" and to become such a gift for each other, through the whole of
their humanity made of femininity and masculinity (also in relation to
that perspective which Genesis 2:24 speaks of), they must be free
precisely in this way.
We mean here freedom especially as mastery of oneself
(self-control). From this aspect, it is indispensable in order that man
may be able to "give himself," that he may become a gift, that he will
be able to "fully discover his true self" in "a sincere giving of himself"
(referring to the words of the Council). Thus the words, "They were naked
and were not ashamed" can and must be understood as the revelation—and
at the same time rediscovery—of
freedom. This freedom makes possible and qualifies the nuptial sense of
the body.
3. Genesis 2:25 says even more, however. It indicates the possibility
and the characteristic of this mutual "experience of the body." It enables
us also to identify that nuptial meaning of the body in actu. When
we read: "They were naked and were not ashamed," we directly touch its
fruits and indirectly touch almost the root of it. Free interiorly from
the constraint of their own bodies and sex, free with the freedom of the
gift, man and woman could enjoy the whole truth, the whole
self-evidence of man, just as God-Yahweh had revealed these things to
them in the mystery of creation.
This truth about man, which the conciliar text states precisely in the
words quoted above, has two main emphases. The first affirms that man is
the only creature in the world that the Creator willed "for its own sake."
The second consists in saying that this same man, willed by the Creator in
this way right from "the beginning," can find himself only in the
disinterested giving of himself. Now, this truth about man, which seems in
particular to grasp the original condition connected with the very
"beginning" of man in the mystery of creation, can be reread—on
the basis of the conciliar text—in
both directions. This rereading helps us to understand even more
the nuptial meaning of the body. This meaning seems inscribed in the
original condition of man and woman (according to Genesis 2:23-25) and in
particular in the meaning of their original nakedness.
If, as we have noted, at the root of their nakedness there is the
interior freedom of the gift—the
disinterested gift of oneself—precisely
that gift enables them both, man and woman, to find one another,
since the Creator willed each of them "for his (her) own sake" (cf.
Gaudium et Spes 24). Thus man, in the first beatifying meeting, finds
the woman, and she finds him. In this way he accepts her interiorly. He
accepts her as she is willed "for her own sake" by the Creator, as she is
constituted in the mystery of the image of God through her femininity.
Reciprocally, she accepts him in the same way, as he is willed "for his
own sake" by the Creator, and constituted by him by means of his
masculinity. The revelation and the discovery of the nuptial meaning of
the body consists in this. The Yahwist narrative, and in particular
Genesis 2:25, enables us to deduce that man, as male and female, enters
the world precisely with this awareness of the meaning of the body, of
masculinity and femininity.
4. The human body, oriented interiorly by the sincere gift of the
person, reveals not only its masculinity or femininity on the physical
plane, but reveals also such a value and such a beauty as to go beyond the
purely physical dimension of sexuality.(2) In this manner awareness of the
nuptial meaning of the body, connected with man's masculinity-femininity,
is in a way completed. On the one hand, this meaning indicates a
particular capacity of expressing love, in which man becomes a gift. On
the other hand, the capacity and deep availability for the affirmation of
the person corresponds to it. This is, literally, the capacity of living
the fact that the other—the
woman for the man and the man for the woman—is,
by means of the body, someone willed by the Creator for his or her own
sake. The person is unique and unrepeatable, someone chosen by eternal
Love.
The affirmation of the person is nothing but acceptance of the gift,
which, by means of reciprocity, creates the communion of persons. This
communion is constructed from within. It comprises also the whole
"exteriority" of man, that is, everything that constitutes the pure and
simple nakedness of the body in its masculinity and femininity. Then, as
we read in Genesis 2:25, man and woman were not ashamed. The biblical
expression "were not ashamed" directly indicates "the experience" as a
subjective dimension.
5. Precisely in this subjective dimension, as two human "egos"
determined by their masculinity and femininity, both of them, man and
woman, appear in the mystery of their beatifying "beginning." (We are in
the state of man's original innocence and at the same time, original
happiness.) This is a short appearance, comprising only a few verses in
Genesis. However it is full of a surprising content, theological and
anthropological at the same time. The revelation and discovery of the
nuptial meaning of the body explain man's original happiness, and, at
the same time, it opens the perspective of his earthly history, in which
he will never avoid this indispensable "theme" of his own existence.
The following verses of Genesis, according to the Yahwist text of
chapter 3, show actually that this historical perspective will be
constructed differently from the beatifying beginning (after original
sin). It is all the more necessary, however, to penetrate deeply into the
mysterious structure, theological and at the same time anthropological, of
this beginning. In the whole perspective of his own history, man will not
fail to confer a nuptial meaning on his own body. Even if this meaning
will undergo many distortions, it will always remain the deepest level. It
demands to be revealed in all its simplicity and purity, and to be shown
in its whole truth, as a sign of the image of God. The way that goes from
the mystery of creation to the "redemption of the body" also passes here
(cf. Rom 8).
For the present we are remaining on the threshold of this historical
perspective. On the basis of Genesis 2:23-25, we clearly realize the
connection that exists between the revelation and the discovery of the
nuptial meaning of the body, and man's original happiness. This nuptial
meaning is also beatifying. As such, it manifests in a word the whole
reality of that donation which the first pages of Genesis speak to us of.
Reading them, we are convinced of the fact that the awareness of the
meaning of the body that is derived from them—in
particular of its nuptial meaning—is
the fundamental element of human existence in the world.
This nuptial meaning of the human body can be understood only in the
context of the person. The body has a nuptial meaning because the human
person, as the Council says, is a creature that God willed for his own
sake. At the same time, he can fully discover his true self only in a
sincere giving of himself.
Christ revealed to man and woman, over and above the vocation to
marriage, another vocation—namely,
that of renouncing marriage, in view of the kingdom of heaven. With this
vocation, he highlighted the same truth about the human person. If a man
or a woman is capable of making a gift of himself for the kingdom of
heaven, this proves in its turn (and perhaps even more) that there is the
freedom of the gift in the human body. It means that this body possesses a
full nuptial meaning.
Notes
1) "Indeed, the Lord Jesus, when he prayed to the Father 'that all may
be one...even as we are one'" (Jn 17:21-22), opened up vistas closed to
human reason, for he implied a certain likeness between the union of the
divine Persons, and the unity of God's sons in truth and charity. This
likeness reveals that man, who is the only creature on earth which God
willed for itself, cannot fully find himself except through a sincere gift
of himself" (GS 24).
The strictly theological analysis of Genesis, in particular Gn 2:23-25,
allows us to refer to this text. This constitutes another step between
adequate anthropology and the theology of the body which is closely bound
up with the discovery of the essential characteristics of personal
existence in man's theological prehistory. Although this may meet with
opposition on the part of the evolutionist mentality (even among
theologians), it would be difficult, however, not to realize that the text
of Genesis that we have analyzed, especially Gn 2:23-25, proves not only
the "original," but also the "exemplary" dimension of the existence of
man, in particular of man as male and female.
2) Biblical tradition reports a distant echo of the physical perfection
of the first man. The prophet Ezekiel, implicitly comparing the king of
Tyre with Adam in Eden, writes as follows:
You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty;
you were in Eden, the garden of God... (Ez 28:12-13).
|
