|CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: LINUS, SAINT AND POPE (About A. D. 64 or 67-76 or 79)|
ancient records of the Roman bishops which have been handed down to us by St.
Irenaeus, Julius Africanus, St. Hippolytus, Eusebius, also the Liberian
catalogue of 354, place the name of Linus directly after that of the Prince of
the Apostles, St. Peter. These records are traced back to a list of the Roman
bishops which existed in the time of Pope Eleutherus (about 174-189), when
Irenaeus wrote his book "Adversus haereses". As opposed to this
testimony, we cannot accept as more reliable Tertullian's assertion, which
unquestionably places St. Clement (De praescriptione, xxii) after the Apostle
Peter, as was also done later by other Latin scholars (Jerome, " De vir.
ill.", xv). The Roman list in Irenaeus has undoubtedly greater claims to
historical authority. This author claims that Pope Linus is the Linus mentioned
by St. Paul in his II Tim., iv, 21. The passage by Irenaeus (Adv. haereses, III,
iii, 3) reads: "After the Holy Apostles (Peter and Paul) had founded and
set the Church in order (in Rome) they gave over the exercise of the episcopal
office to Linus. The same Linus ii mentioned by St. Paul in his Epistle to
Timothy. His successor was Anacletus". We cannot be positive whether this
identification of the pope as being the Linus mentioned in II Tim., iv, 21, goes
back to an ancient and reliable source, or originated later on account of the
similarity of the name. Linus's term of office, according to the papal lists
handed down to us, lasted only twelve years. The Liberian Catalogue shows that
it lasted twelve years, four months, and twelve days. The dates given in this
catalogue, A.D. 56 until A.D. 67, are incorrect. Perhaps it was on account of
these dates that the writers of the fourth century gave their opinion that Linus
had held the position of head of the Roman community during the life of the
Apostle; e. g., Rufinus in the preface to his translation of the pseudo-Clementine
"Recognitiones". But this hypothesis has no historical foundation. It
cannot be doubted that according to the accounts of Irenaeus concerning the
Roman Church in the second century, Linus was chosen to be head of the community
of Christians in Rome, after the death of the Apostle. For this reason his
pontificate dates from the year of the death of the Apostles Peter and Paul,
which, however, is not known for certain. The "Liber Pontificalis"
asserts that Linus' home was in Tuscany, and that his father's name was
Herculanus; but we cannot discover the origin of this assertion. According to
the same work on the popes, Linus is supposed to have issued a decree "in
conformity with the ordinance of St. Peter", that women should have their
heads covered in church. Without doubt this decree is apocryphal, and copied by
the author of the "Liber Pontificalis" from the first Epistle of St.
Paul to the Corinthians (xi, 5) and arbitrarily attributed to the first
successor of the Apostle in Rome. The statement made in the same source, that
Linus suffered martyrdom, cannot be proved and is improbable. For between Nero
and Domitian there is no mention of any persecution of the Roman Church; and
Irenaeus (1. c., III, iv, 3) from among the early Roman bishops designates only
Telesphorus as a glorious martyr.
Finally this book asserts that Linus after his death, was buried in the Vatican beside St. Peter. We do not know whether the author had any decisive reason for this assertion. As St. Peter was certainly buried at the foot of the Vatican Hill, it is quite possible that the earliest bishops of the Roman Church also were interred there. There was nothing in the liturgical tradition of the fourth-century Roman Church to prove this, because it was only at the end of the second century that any special feast of martyrs was instituted and consequently Linus does not appear in the fourth-century lists of the feasts of the Roman saints. According to Torrigio ("Le sacre grotte Vaticane", Viterbo, 1618, 53) when the present confession was constructed in St. Peter's (1615), sarcophagi were found, and among them was one which bore the word Linus. The explanation given by Severano of this discovery ("Memorie delle sette chiese di Roma", Rome, 1630, 120) is that probably these sarcophagi contained the remains of the first Roman bishops, and that the one bearing that inscription was Linus's burial place. This assertion was repeated later on by different writers. But from a MS. of Torrigio's we see that on the sarcophagus in question there were other letters beside the word Linus, so that they rather belonged to some other name (such as Aquilinus, Anullinus). The place of the discovery of the tomb is a proof that it could not be the tomb of Linus. (De Rossi, "Inscriptiones christianae urbis Romae", II, 23-7). The feast of St. Linus is now celebrated on 23 September. This is also the date given in the " Liber Pontificalis ". An epistle on the martyrdom of the Apostles St. Peter and Paul was at a later period attributed to St. Linus, and supposedly was sent by him to the Eastern Churches. It is apocryphal and of later date than the history of the martyrdom of the two Apostles, by some attributed to Marcellus, which is also apocryphal ("Acta Apostolorum apocrypha", ed. Lipsius and Bonnet, I, ed; Leipzig, 1891, XIV sqq., 1 sqq.)
<The Apostolic Fathers>; <St. Clement of Rome>, I (London, 1890), 201 sqq.; HARNACK, <Geschichte der Altchristlichen Literatur>, II: <Die Chronologie> I (Leipzig, 1897), 70; <Acta SS.> September, VI, 539 sqq., <Liber Pontificalis>, ed. DUCHESNE, I, 121: cf. <Introduction>, lxix; DE SMEDT, <Dissertationes selectae in primam aetatem hist. eccl.>, I, 300 sqq.
Transcribed by Gerard Haffner
Provided Courtesy of: