| Part 1 Interview With Bioethicist on Umbilical
Cord Cell Banking
By Kathleen Naab
PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania, 8 JUNE 2009 (ZENIT)
The debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research is portrayed as
an exercise in discerning politics from science.
But there are undoubtedly some personal issues involved. The stem cell
debate gets personal when citizens' tax dollars are used to fund the
research, regardless of if the citizens are in agreement.
As the U.S. government follows President Barack Obama's March 9
executive order to direct U.S. tax dollars to the funding of embryonic
stem cell research, ZENIT spoke with Father Alfred Cioffi about stem
cell research and the particular promise offered by these powerful cells
found in umbilical cord blood.
Father Cioffi, a priest of the Archdiocese of Miami, is a research
ethicist for the National Catholic Bioethics Center. He has done
extensive study and work in bioethics and research, focusing his first
doctoral thesis from Rome's Pontifical Gregorian University on "The
Fetus as Medical Patient: Moral Dilemmas in Prenatal Diagnosis." He
earned a second doctorate in genetics from Purdue University, with a
thesis on "The VWG Hypothesis: Predicting Distinct Chromatin Structures
from the DNA Sequence."
ZENIT: There is still a lot of public confusion about stem cell research
and what it's all about
—
oftentimes confusion amplified by false or misleading press reports.
Could you explain the basics of the research?
Father Cioffi: The cell is the basic unit of life on this planet earth.
All living creatures are made up of cells. Our bodies are made up of
trillions of cells: bone cells, skin cells, liver cells, brain cells,
etc,. Stem cells are cells deep within our body that produce other
cells; stem cells make other cells. So, when we are either developing,
or when there is an injury or disease, stem cells are active making new
cells —
either to form an organ or tissue, or to repair a damaged organ or
tissue.
Stem cell research uses stem cells in the lab to try to heal injured
organs and tissues of the human body. It does this by seeking to turn
human stem cells into cell lines. Our bodies are made up of
approximately 220 cell lines: bone cells, muscle cells, brain cells,
liver cells, etc,.
According to their origin, there are two types of stem cells: embryonic
stem cells and adult stem cells. Embryonic stem cells come from embryos;
adult stem cells come from "adults," that is, from people who are
already born
—
so, even babies have "adult" stem cells, because they are already born.
So far, the only stem cells that have given results are the adult stem
cells, and there's a fairly simple explanation for this.
Embryonic stem cells actually have too much potential; why? Because all
of the organs and tissues of the embryo come from embryonic stem cells
—
the whole embryo is formed from embryonic stem cells. So, when embryonic
stem cells are transplanted into an injured organ or tissue, they
actually grow uncontrollably, too fast, too much. The end result is a
tumor: cancer. Why? Because, essentially, the whole little embryo wants
to grow there, where the embryonic stem cells have been placed.
To obtain embryonic stem cells, the embryo has to be killed, destroyed.
That is why the Catholic Church, and many people of conscience, are
opposed to embryonic stem cell research.
In contrast, adult stem cells, coming from the various organs and
tissues of our bodies, are more tame, and do not grow as fast or as
much. Why? Essentially, because all that is needed to heal, say, a skin
cut, is for the adult skin stem cells to grow just enough skin to
replace the damaged area. In other words: Adult stem cells are already
pre-programmed to replace the various organs and tissues of our body,
each according to its type.
No one has to be killed to obtain adult stem cells. In fact, an added
advantage is that they can be obtained from the same patient, thus
avoiding the problem of immune rejection of the embryonic stem cells.
That is why the Catholic Church actually encourages adult stem cell
research.
ZENIT: So when U.S. President Barack Obama spoke of the triumph of
science a few weeks ago with his reversal of the Bush ban for federal
funding on stem cell research, he missed the mark?
Father Cioffi: He missed the mark indeed. Sadly, that decision was
entirely driven by an ideology that puts a particular agenda in front of
whatever scientific evidence there is. The reader can go to
www.stemcellresearch.org, and see for himself the dozens of cures that
have already been obtained with adult stem cells, and the zero cures
with embryonic
—
all documented with research articles in scientific journals.
ZENIT: So why is there interest in embryonic stem cells?
Father Cioffi: Three main reasons, I believe: finances, theoretical
biology, and ideology.
Finances: Sadly, because of the money involved. It's all about the
patents. It turns out that, since there have been so many successes in
adult stem cell research, practically all of the patents are already
taken up by biotechs and pharmaceuticals. However, due to the lack of
results with embryonic stem cells, the slightest success in a particular
biochemical pathway breakthrough is patentable, and the patent field
here is wide open. Certainly, this is highly speculative research (using
embryonic stem cells), which is what tends to give better returns when
there is the tiniest hint of possible success. At a time when the
economy is struggling, these speculative investments are a big
temptation to provide the “quick fix” that everyone is desiring, so
promises sell big during these times. To witness: In 2004, pro-embryonic
stem cell ideologues convinced the people of California to devote $3
billion of their state taxes to this research, sold as the “cure-all”
for the state’s financial bankruptcy.
Theoretical biology: Theoretically, embryonic stem cells should be able
to regenerate and replace all of the 220 cell lines that make up the
tissues and organs of our body. Why? Because they come from the Inner
Cell Mass of the very early human embryo (the blastocyst: about one to
two weeks old), and the entire embryo develops from the Inner Cell Mass.
In practice, however, as I explained above, these cells have too much
potential, and end up growing uncontrollably, causing tumors. Therefore,
some scientists are saying: “Give us enough time and money, and we’ll
tame these ‘wild’ embryonic stem cells to grow into the various cell
lines needed.” And that’s precisely what we, as pro-life people, don’t
want scientists to do, because using more time and more money means
destroying many more human embryos in the process. And, of course, if
they are successful eventually, that would only stimulate even more
scientists to destroy more human embryos for their coveted stem cells.
Ideology: Embryonic stem cell research has nothing to do with the
legalization of abortion, and has everything to do with the legalization
of abortion. It has nothing to do with the legalization of abortion
because there is no pregnancy involved. That is, these early embryos (blastocysts)
are typically frozen in liquid nitrogen (cryopreserved) in in vitro
fertilization clinics, and are considered “excess” by their parents,
since their parents already obtained the pregnancy and birth of the baby
that they wanted. If there is no pregnancy, then there is no “conflict
of interest” between the mother and her unborn. On the other hand, it
has everything to do with the legalization of abortion. Why? Because, by
giving some human status to these frozen human embryos, it begins to
undermine the abortion mentality that says, “They are not really human
beings.” In other words, the pro-abortion (pro-choice) forces in our
society are adamantly opposed to any suggestion of even the earliest
human embryo being recognized as human. In the mind of these ideologues
it is essential to continue to promote the perception that these early
human embryos are “just a clump of cells” that should be used for
advancing medical cures.
When Stem Cell Research Gets Personal
Part 2
Interview With Bioethicist on Umbilical Cord Cell Banking
By Kathleen Naab
PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania, 9 JUNE 2009 (ZENIT)The debate about stem
cell research is under way in legislatures around the world, but there
is an element to the research that is debated within the home.
This intimate level of the discussion happens every time a pregnant
couple faces the possibility of storing their newborn's umbilical cord
blood (or rather, the stem cells it contains) in hopes of future
treatment or cures, should they be necessary.
ZENIT spoke with Father Alfred Cioffi about stem cell research and the
particular promise offered by these powerful cells found in umbilical
cord blood.
Father Cioffi, a priest of the Archdiocese of Miami, is a research
ethicist for the National Catholic Bioethics Center. He has done
extensive study and work in bioethics and research, focusing his first
doctoral thesis from Rome's Pontifical Gregorian University on "The
Fetus as Medical Patient: Moral Dilemmas in Prenatal Diagnosis." He
earned a second doctorate in genetics from Purdue University, with a
thesis on "The VWG Hypothesis: Predicting Distinct Chromatin Structures
from the DNA Sequence."
Part 1 of this interview, detailing the basics of stem cell research,
was published Monday.
ZENIT: Going to a more particular question, what is the difference
between adult stem cells and stem cells taken from umbilical cord blood?
Father Cioffi: Regarding umbilical cord stem cells, bioethically, they
represent a special category. It turns out that the blood inside the
umbilical cord also contains stem cells. Since the umbilical cord comes
from the human embryo (or fetus), then these are embryonic stem cells.
The umbilical cord is normally discarded once the baby is born, but
these embryonic stem cells can be extracted from that cord blood without
having to do the least damage to the baby. In a sense, this is the best
of both worlds because, on the one hand, umbilical cord stem cells have
the plasticity and high-quality healing capacity of embryonic stem cells
and, on the other, the baby certainly doesn’t have to be killed in order
to obtain them.
ZENIT: So then let's turn to another side of this issue: parents
considering storing their newborn's stem cells. Some
—
perhaps most
—
pregnancy books, obstetricians and pediatricians are cautious about
recommending umbilical cord banking and even somewhat discouraging.
Would you say this is a justified attitude? Does it reflect a lack of
information? Or perhaps the effects of an anti-life ideology?
Father Cioffi: The downside of umbilical cord stem cells is mostly
financial. It is relatively expensive to extract them
—
I've heard for the United States, perhaps about $1,000
—
and then there's a monthly fee
—
of about $100
—
to store them. How long would they be stored? Essentially, for life, or
until the newborn has an injury or disease sometime in his lifetime.
And, hopefully, that injury or disease could be healed with the saved
umbilical cord stem cells.
ZENIT: So what would you recommend for pregnant couples? Is umbilical
cord banking worth the price tag?
Father Cioffi: You have to consider several factors: How much is it
likely to cost; up front and in the long run? What cures could be
expected realistically, and in what time frame? Since cord blood stem
cell research is an industry that is just now beginning, perhaps for now
the couples who would benefit the most from storing cord blood stem
cells are the ones who have another child who was either born with some
illness or acquired some illness or injury that could be cured with the
stem cells of the sibling, since coming from the same parents the tissue
match would likely be a good one.
In the long run, umbilical cord stem cells offer tremendous potential,
so my bottom-line recommendation for couples considering their storage
when giving birth is this: If the couple can afford it (perhaps even
with some help from family and friends
—
“baby-shower donations accepted!”), then they should do it. Why?
Because, in addition to obvious advantages to their baby, siblings and
close relatives, this would also further this fledging industry that is
indeed very pro-life, and needs all the help it can get in getting
started.
If the couple cannot afford it, they could consider putting some
“friendly pressure” on their health insurance company to cover, at
least, some of the cost. I think that it is important to get health
insurance companies to understand that their investment in umbilical
cord blood stem cell storage is to their financial advantage in the long
run. Why? Because, as more and more cures come about in this field, on
average, more and more of their clients would benefit from them
—
say, for instance, an injured teenager whose cord cells were saved, and
who will now heal better and faster because of them, thus reducing his
hospital stay and treatment sessions, thus reducing health care
insurance costs.
--- --- ---
On the Net:
National Catholic Bioethics Center: www.ncbcenter.org
Stem Cell Research: www.stemcellresearch.org
|