|
According to
Father Thomas Williams, Theology Dean at Regina Apostolorum
ROME, 25 OCT. 2003 (ZENIT).
Below is an adapted translation of an address given
by Legionary of Christ Father Thomas D. Williams, dean of theology at
the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University, on the Church's social
doctrine. He gave the Italian-language address Sept. 19 at an
international theological forum organized by the Vatican Congregation
for the Clergy.
* * *
The Foundations of the Church's Social Doctrine
Father Thomas Williams, LC
The objective of the Church's social doctrine is not only intellectual
or cognitive, but also eminently practical and personal. It should
change our lives and help us assume our own responsibilities vis-ΰ-vis
the common good, especially as far as those most in need are concerned.
I intend to develop this brief presentation on the Church's social
doctrine in four parts: its definition; its nature; its foundations; and
several practical suggestions.
1. What is it?
Though we may have a general idea of what Catholic social doctrine is,
it is often simpler to eliminate false notions but starting with what it
is not.
The Church makes clear that her social teaching is not a "third
way," some middle road between capitalism and socialism. It is not
an economic or political agenda at all, and nor is it a
"system." Although it does, for example, offer a critique of
socialism and capitalism, it does not propose an alternative system. It
is not a technical proposal for solving practical problems, but rather a
moral doctrine, arising from the Christian concept of man and his
vocation to love and to eternal life. It is in a category of its own.
Catholic social doctrine is not a utopia, in the sense of a social
project impossible to achieve. It does not intend to describe an earthly
paradise in which mankind can attain perfection.
In spite of all this, Catholic social teaching seriously confronts
existing realities and structures, and challenges humankind to look for
solutions to social, political and economic situations worthy of human
dignity, thereby creating a healthy degree of tension between temporal
realities as they stand and the Gospel's ideal.
Catholic social teaching is not a static, fixed doctrine, but a dynamic
application of Christ's teaching to the changing realities and
circumstances of human societies and cultures. Of course, the
fundamental principles do not change, because they are deeply rooted in
human nature. But its applications and contingent judgments adapt to new
historical circumstances according to times and places.
The Church's social doctrine belongs within the framework of theology
and especially moral theology.
According to the magisterial wording, it is the accurate formulation of
the results of careful meditation on the complex realities of
humankind's existence, in society and in an international context, in
the light of the faith and of the Church's living tradition.
It is an ensemble of the principles, criteria and guidelines for action,
with the aim of interpreting social, cultural, economic and political
realities, assessing their conformity with or diversity from the
Gospel's teachings on the human person and his earthly and transcendent
vocation.
2. The content of Catholic Social Teaching
The content of social doctrine is expressed on three levels:
Principles and fundamental values. Social doctrine acquires its
basic principles from theology and philosophy, with help from the human
and social sciences that complement it. These principles include the
dignity of the human person, the common good, solidarity, participation,
private property, and the universal destination of goods. Fundamental
values include truth, freedom, justice, charity and peace.
Criteria for judgment: for economic systems, institutions,
organizations, also using empirical data. Examples: the Church's
evaluation of communism, liberalism, liberation theology, racism,
globalization, just wages, etc.
Guidelines for action: contingent opinions on historical events.
This is not a logical and necessary deduction arising from principles,
but also the result of the Church's pastoral experience and a Christian
perception of reality; a preferential option for the poor, dialogue, and
respect for the legitimate autonomy of political, economic and social
realities. Example: suggestions for the pardon of international debt,
agricultural reform, creation of cooperatives, etc. (see "Gaudium
et Spes," Nos. 67-70).
3. Foundations
The first foundation of Catholic social teaching is Jesus' commandment
to
love: Love God above all things and love your neighbor as you love
yourself. This is the foundation for all Christian morals, and therefore
of the Church's social doctrine that is part of morals. Jesus said that
the dual commandment of love is not only the first and most important of
all commandments, but also a summary or compendium of all God's laws and
the message of the prophets.
The Church's social doctrine therefore provides an answer to the
question: How should I love God and my neighbor within my political,
economic and social context? Our love for God and neighbor does not
simply consist in a weekly obligation to attend Mass and throwing a few
coins in the basket at offertory time. It must permeate our entire life
and conform our actions and our environment to the Gospel.
This is a very important principle for overcoming the tendency to see
the economy or politics as something totally separate from morals, when
in fact it is precisely there that a Christian makes his faith influence
temporal matters.
The commandment to love therefore should represent the general
foundation of the Church's social doctrine. There are, however, also
specific foundations that can be summarized in four basic principles of
the Church's entire social doctrine, four columns on which the whole
building is supported. These principles are: the dignity of the human
person, the common good, subsidiarity and solidarity.
The dignity of the human person. The first classical principle is
that of the dignity of the human person, which provides the foundation
for human rights. To think correctly about society, politics, economy
and culture one must first understand properly who a human being is and
what his real good is. Each person, created in the image and likeness of
God, has an inalienable dignity and must therefore always be treated as
an end and not only as a means.
When Jesus, using the image of the Good Shepherd, spoke of the lost
sheep, he taught us what God thinks about the value of the individual
human person. The shepherd leaves the 99 in the wilderness to seek out
the lost one. God does not think of human beings en masse, or in
percentages, but as individuals. Each one is precious to him,
irreplaceable.
In his encyclical letter Centesimus Annus, Pope John Paul II underscored
the centrality of this principle: "It is necessary to keep in mind
that the main thread, and in a certain sense the guiding principle ...
of the Church's social doctrine, is a correct view of the human person
and of his unique value, inasmuch as "man ... is the only creature
on earth which God willed for itself." God has imprinted his own
image and likeness on man (see Genesis 1:26), conferring upon him an
incomparable dignity (see "Centesimus Annus," No. 11).
Hence the Church does not think first in terms of nations, political
parties, tribes or ethnic groups, but rather of the individual person.
The Church, like Christ, defends the dignity of each individual. She
understands the importance of the state and of society in terms of
service to people and to families, rather than the other way around. The
state in particular has the duty to protect the rights of persons,
rights that are not bestowed by the state but by the Creator.
The common good. The second classical principle of the Church's
social doctrine is the principle of the common good. The Second Vatican
Council defines it as "the sum total of social conditions which
allow people, either as groups or as individuals, to reach their
fulfillment more fully and more easily." ("Gaudium et Spes,"
26; see GS, 74; and Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1906).
Man, created in the image of God who is Trinitarian communion of
persons, achieves his perfection not in isolation from others, but
within communities and through the gift of self which makes communion
possible. The selfishness that urges us to search for our own good to
the detriment of others is overcome by a commitment to the common good.
The "common good" is not exclusively mine or yours, and nor is
it the sum of the good of individuals, but rather creates a new subjectwein
which each discovers his own good in communion with others. Therefore
the common good does not belong to an abstract entity like the state,
but to persons as individuals called to communion.
Man is fundamentally (and not only circumstantially) social, relational
and interpersonal. Our common good is also necessary for my own
fulfillment, meaning for my own personal good. Each person grows and
reaches fulfillment within society and through society. Hence, the
common good is distinct from but not in opposition to each individual's
particular good. Very often, your good and my good meet in our common
good.
The common good does instead oppose utilitarianism, the idea of the
greatest possible happiness (pleasure) for the highest possible number
of people, which inevitably leads to the minority being subordinated to
the majority. Therefore the excellence and inviolability of the
individual human person excludes the possibility of subordinating the
good of one to that of others, thereby converting the first into a means
for the happiness of others.
Subsidiarity. The third classical principle of social doctrine is
the principle of subsidiarity. It was first expressed under that name by
Pope Pius XI in his 1931 encyclical letter "Quadragesimo Anno."
This principle teaches us that society's decisions must be left at the
lowest possible level, therefore at the level closest to those affected
by the decision. This principle was formulated when the world was
threatened by totalitarian systems with their doctrines based on the
individual's subordination to the collectivity. It invites us to search
for solutions to social problems in the private sector before asking the
state to interfere.
Even prior to Pius' encyclical, Pope Leo XIII himself insisted "on
necessary limits to the state's intervention and on its instrumental
character, inasmuch as the individual, the family and society are prior
to the state, and inasmuch as the state exists in order to protect their
rights and not stifle them" ("Centesimus Annus," 11).
Solidarity. The fourth founding principle of the Church's social
doctrine was only recently formulated by John Paul II in his encyclical
letter "Sollicitudo Rei Socialis" (1987). This principle is
called the principle of solidarity. Faced with globalization, the
growing interdependence of people and populations, we must bear in mind
that the human family is one. Solidarity invites us to increase our
sensitivity for others, especially those who suffer.
But the Holy Father adds that solidarity is not simply a feeling, but a
real "virtue" which enables us to assume our responsibilities
for one another. The Holy Father wrote that solidarity "is not a
feeling of vague compassion or shallow distress at the misfortunes of so
many people, both near and far. On the contrary, it is a firm and
persevering determination to commit oneself to the common good; that is
to say to the good of all and of each individual, because we are all
really responsible for all" (SRS, 38).
4. Practical advice
I would lastly like to sketch five practical suggestions regarding the
application of Catholic social teaching, especially for us priests:
Read and have good, precise knowledge of the Church's social
teachings, to be able to expound them with assurance and clarity, and
make sure that what we teach in the name of the Church is effectively
what the Church teaches, and not our own personal opinions.
Humility, so as not to have to jump from general principles to
definitive concrete judgments, especially when expressed in a
categorical and absolute manner. We should not go beyond the limitations
of our own knowledge and specific competence.
Realism in assessing the human condition, acknowledging sin but
leaving room for the action of God's grace. In the midst of our
commitment to human development, never lose sight that man's vocation is
above all to be a saint and enjoy God for eternity.
Avoid the temptation of using the Church's social doctrine as a
weapon for judging "others" (entrepreneurs, politicians,
multinational companies, etc.). We should instead concentrate first on
our own lives and our personal, social, economic and political
responsibilities.
Know how to closely cooperate with lay people, forming them and
sending them out as evangelizers of the world. They are the true experts
in their fields of competence and have the specific vocation of
transforming temporal realities according to the Gospel.
ZE03102501
|