| English mystic of the fourteenth century, author or recipient of the
vision contained in the book known as the "Sixteen Revelations of Divine
Love". The original form of her name appears to have been Julian. She
was probably a Benedictine nun, living as a recluse in an anchorage of
which traces still remain in the east part of the churchyard of St.
Julian in Norwich, which belonged to Carrow Priory. According to her
book, this revelation was "shewed" to her on 8 or 14 May (the readings
differ), 1373, when she was thirty years and a half old. This would
refer her birth to the end of 1342. Her statement, that "for twenty
years after the time of this shewing, save three months, I had teaching
inwardly", proves that the book was not written before 1393. An early
fifteenth-century manuscript, recently purchased for the British Museum
from the Amherst library, states that she "yet is on life, Anno Domini
1413". It is probable that this is the manuscript cited by Francis
Blomefield, the eigtheenth-century historian of Norfolk, and that a
misreading of the date led to the statement that she was still living in
1442. Attempts have been made to identify her with Lady Julian Lampet,
the anchoress of Carrow, references concerning legacies to whom occur in
documents from 1426 to 1478; but this is manifestly impossible. The
newly-discovered manuscript differs considerably from the complete
version hitherto known, of which it is a kind of condensation, lacking
the beginning and the end. Only three, much later, manuscripts of the
fuller text are known to exist. The earliest, in the Bibliotheque
Nationale at Paris (from which the book was first edited by Serenus de
Cressy in 1670), dates from the sixteenth century; the other two, both
in the British Museum and not independent of each other, belong to the
seventeenth. The better of the latter is evidently a copy of a much
earlier original.
Whatever be their precise date, these "Revelations", or "Shewings",
are the most perfect fruit of later medieval mysticism in England.
Juliana described herself as a "simple creature unlettered" when she
received them; but, in the years that intervened between the vision and
the composition of the book, she evidently acquired some knowledge of
theological phraseology, and her work appears to show the influence of
Walter Hilton, as well as neo-Platonic analogies, the latter probably
derived from the anonymous author of the "Divine Cloud of Unknowing".
There is one passage, concerning the place in Christ's side for all
mankind that shall be saved, which argues an acquaintance with the
letters of St. Catherine of Siena. The psychological insight with which
she describes her condition, distinguishing the manner of her vision and
recognizing when she has to deal with a mere delusion, is worthy of St.
Teresa. When seemingly at the point of death, in the bodily sickness for
which she had prayed in order to renew her spiritual life, she passes
into a trance while contemplating the crucifix, and has the vision of
Christ's suffering "in which all the shewings that follow be grounded
and joined".
The book is the record of twenty years' meditation upon that one
experience; for, "when the shewing, which is given for a time, is passed
and hid, then faith keepeth it by grace of the Holy Ghost unto our lives
end". More than fifteen years later, she received "in ghostly
understanding" the explanation, the key to all religious experience:
"What? wouldest thou wit thy Lord's meaning in this thing? Wit it well:
Love was His meaning. Who sheweth it thee? Love. Wherefore sheweth He it
thee? For love. Hold thee therein, thou shalt wit more in the same. But
thou shalt never wit therein other without end." With this illumination,
the whole mystery of Redemption and the purpose of human life become
clear to her, and even the possibility of sin and the existence of evil
does not trouble her, but is made "a bliss by love". This is the great
deed, transcending our reason, that the Blessed Trinity shall do at the
last day: "Thou shalt see thyself that all manner of thing shall be
well." Like St. Catherine, Juliana has little of the dualism of body and
soul that is frequent in the mystics. God is in our "sensuality" as well
as in our "substance", and the body and the soul render mutual aid:
"Either of them take help of other till we be brought up into stature,
as kind worketh." Knowledge of God and knowledge of self are
inseparable: we may never come to the knowing of one without the knowing
of the other. "God is more nearer to us than our own soul", and "in
falling and rising we are ever preciously kept in one love." She lays
special stress upon the "homeliness" and "courtesy" of God's dealings
with us, "for love maketh might and wisdom full meek to us." With this
we must correspond by a happy confidence; "failing of comfort" is the
"most mischief" into which the soul can fall. In the Blessed Virgin the
Lord would have all mankind see how they are loved. Throughout her
revelation Juliana submits herself to the authority of the Church: "I
yield me to our mother Holy Church, as a simple child oweth."
EDMUND G. GARDNER
|