|
I. Introduction
1. Jesus Christ was sent by the Father to proclaim the Gospel,
calling all people to conversion and faith (cf. Mk 1:14-15).
After his resurrection, he entrusted the continuation of his mission
of evangelization to the Apostles (cf. Mt 28:19-20; Mk
16:15; Lk 24:4-7; Acts 1:3): “As the Father has sent
me, so I send you” (Jn 20:21, cf. 17:18). By means of the
Church, Christ wants to be present in every historical epoch, every
place on earth and every sector of society, in order to reach every
person, so that there may be one flock and one shepherd (cf. Jn
10:16): “Go out into the whole world and preach the Gospel to every
creature. He who believes and is baptized will be saved, but he who
does not believe will be condemned” (Mk 16:15-16).
The Apostles, therefore, “prompted by the Spirit, invited all to
change their lives, to be converted and to be baptized”,[1]
because the “pilgrim Church is necessary for salvation”.[2]
It is the same Lord Jesus Christ who, present in his Church, goes
before the work of evangelizers, accompanies it, follows it, and
makes their labours bear fruit: what took place at the origins of
Christian history continues throughout its entire course.
At the beginning of the third millennium, the call which Peter
and his brother Andrew, as well as the other first disciples, heard
from Jesus continues to resound in the world: “put out into the deep
and lower your nets for a catch” (Lk 5:4).[3]
And after the miracle of a huge catch of fish, the Lord revealed to
Peter that he would become “a fisher of men” (Lk 5:10).
2. The term evangelization has a very rich meaning.[4]
In the broad sense, it sums up the Church’s entire mission: her
whole life consists in accomplishing the traditio Evangelii,
the proclamation and handing on of the Gospel, which is “the power
of God for the salvation of everyone who believes” (Rom 1:16)
and which, in the final essence, is identified with Jesus Christ
himself (cf. 1 Cor 1:24). Understood in this way,
evangelization is aimed at all of humanity. In any case, to
evangelize does not mean simply to teach a doctrine, but to
proclaim Jesus Christ by one’s words and actions, that is, to make
oneself an instrument of his presence and action in the world.
“Every person has the right to hear the ‘Good News’ of the God
who reveals and gives himself in Christ, so that each one can live
out in its fullness his or her proper calling”.[5]
It a right which the Lord himself confers on every person, so that
every man and woman is able truly to say with Saint Paul: Jesus
Christ “loved me and gave himself up for me” (Gal 2:20). This
right implies the corresponding duty to evangelize: “If I preach the
Gospel, this is no reason for me to boast; it is a duty for me. Woe
to me if I do not preach the Gospel!” (1 Cor 9:16; cf. Rom
10:14). Thus, it is evident how every activity of the Church has an
essential evangelizing dimension and must never be separated from
the commitment to help all persons to meet Christ in faith, which is
the primary objective of evangelization: “Social issues and the
Gospel are inseparable. When we bring people only knowledge,
ability, technical competence and tools, we bring them too little”.[6]
3. There is today, however, a growing confusion which leads many
to leave the missionary command of the Lord unheard and ineffective
(cf. Mt 28:19). Often it is maintained that any attempt to
convince others on religious matters is a limitation of their
freedom. From this perspective, it would only be legitimate to
present one’s own ideas and to invite people to act according to
their consciences, without aiming at their conversion to Christ and
to the Catholic faith. It is enough, so they say, to help people to
become more human or more faithful to their own religion; it is
enough to build communities which strive for justice, freedom, peace
and solidarity. Furthermore, some maintain that Christ should not be
proclaimed to those who do not know him, nor should joining the
Church be promoted, since it would also be possible to be saved
without explicit knowledge of Christ and without formal
incorporation in the Church.
In the face of these problems, the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith has judged it necessary to publish the present Note.
This document, which presupposes the entirety of Catholic doctrine
on evangelization, as extensively treated in the teaching of Paul VI
and John Paul II, is intended to clarify certain aspects of the
relationship between the missionary command of the Lord and respect
for the conscience and religious freedom of all people. It is an
issue with important anthropological, ecclesiological and ecumenical
implications.
II. Some anthropological implications
4. “This is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true
God and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (Jn 17:3). God has
given human beings intellect and will so that they might freely
seek, know and love him. Therefore, human freedom is both a resource
and a challenge offered to man by God who has created him: an offer
directed to the human person’s capacity to know and to love what is
good and true. Nothing puts in play human freedom like the search
for the good and the true, by inviting it to a kind of commitment
which involves fundamental aspects of life. This is particularly the
case with salvific truth, which is not only an object of thought,
but also an event which encompasses the entire person –
intelligence, will, feelings, actions and future plans – when a
person adheres to Christ. In the search for the good and the true,
the Holy Spirit is already at work, opening the human heart and
making it ready to welcome the truth of the Gospel, as Thomas
Aquinas stated in his celebrated phrase: omne verum a quocumque
dicatur a Spiritu Sancto est.[7]
It is important therefore to appreciate this action of the Spirit,
who creates an affinity for the truth and draws the human heart
towards it, by helping human knowledge to mature both in wisdom and
in trusting abandonment to what is true.[8]
Today, however, with ever-increasing frequency, questions are
being raised about the legitimacy of presenting to others – so that
they might in turn accept it – that which is held to be true for
oneself. Often this is seen as an infringement of other people’s
freedom. Such a vision of human freedom, separated from its integral
reference to truth, is one of the expressions “of that relativism
which, recognizing nothing as definitive, leaves as the ultimate
criterion only the self with its desires and under the semblance of
freedom, becomes a prison for each one”.[9]
In the various forms of agnosticism and relativism present in
contemporary thought, “a legitimate plurality of positions has
yielded to an undifferentiated pluralism, based upon the assumption
that all positions are equally valid, which is one of today’s most
widespread symptoms of the lack of confidence in truth. Even certain
conceptions of life coming from the East betray this lack of
confidence, denying truth its exclusive character and assuming that
truth reveals itself equally in different doctrines, even if they
contradict one another”.[10]
If man denies his fundamental capacity for the truth, if he becomes
skeptical regarding his ability really to know what is true, he ends
up losing what in a unique way draws his intelligence and enthralls
his heart.
5. In this connection, when it comes to the search for truth,
whoever trusts only in his own individual efforts and does not
recognize the need for help from others, is deceiving himself. Human
beings “from birth, therefore, are immersed in traditions which give
them not only a language and a cultural formation but also a range
of truths in which they believe almost instinctively… Nonetheless,
there are in the life of a human being many more truths which are
simply believed than truths which are acquired by way of personal
verification”.[11] The
need to trust in the knowledge handed on by one’s culture or
acquired by others, enriches a person with truths that could not
have been attained on one’s own, as well as by the interpersonal and
social relationships which this process develops. Spiritual
individualism, on the other hand, isolates a person, hindering him
from opening in trust to others – so as both to receive and to
bestow the abundant goods which nourish his freedom – and
jeopardizes the right to manifest one’s own convictions and opinions
in society.[12]
In particular, the truth which is capable of shedding light on
the meaning of one’s life and giving it direction, is similarly
attained through trusting acceptance with regard to those persons
who are able to guarantee the certainty and authenticity of the
truth itself: “There is no doubt that the capacity to entrust
oneself and one’s life to another person and the decision to do so
are among the most significant and expressive human acts”.[13]
Although it happens on a deeper level, the acceptance of revelation
which takes place through faith also falls within the dynamics of
the search for truth: “‘The obedience of faith’ (Rom 16:26;
cf. Rom 1:5; 2 Cor 10:5-6) must be given to God who
reveals; by this obedience of faith man freely commits his entire
self to God, offering ‘the full submission of intellect and will to
God who reveals’ and freely assenting to the revelation given by
him”.[14] The Second
Vatican Council, after having affirmed the right and the duty of
every person to seek the truth in matters of religion adds: “The
search for truth, however, must be carried out in a manner that is
appropriate to the dignity of the human person and his social
nature, namely, by free enquiry with the help of teaching or
instruction, communication and dialogue. It is by these means that
people share with each other the truth they have discovered, or
think they have discovered, in such a way that they help one another
in the search for truth”.[15]
In any case, the truth “does not impose itself except by the
strength of the truth itself”.[16]
Therefore, to lead a person’s intelligence and freedom in honesty to
the encounter with Christ and his Gospel is not an inappropriate
encroachment, but rather a legitimate endeavour and a service
capable of making human relationships more fruitful.
6. Evangelization does not only entail the possibility of
enrichment for those who are evangelized; it is also an enrichment
for the one who does the evangelizing, as well as for the entire
Church. For example, in the process of inculturation, “the universal
Church herself is enriched with forms of expression and values in
the various sectors of Christian life… She comes to know and to
express better the mystery of Christ, all the while being motivated
to continual renewal”.[17]
Indeed, since the day of Pentecost, the Church has manifested the
universality of her mission, welcoming in Christ the countless
riches of peoples from all times and places in human history.[18]
Beyond its intrinsic anthropological value, every encounter with
another person or culture is capable of revealing potentialities of
the Gospel which hitherto may not have been fully explicit and which
will enrich the life of Christians and the Church. Thanks to this
dynamism, “tradition, which comes from the Apostles, makes progress
in the Church by the help of the Holy Spirit”.[19]
It is indeed the Holy Spirit who, after having been operative in
the incarnation of Jesus Christ in the womb of the Blessed Virgin
Mary, animates the maternal action of the Church in the
evangelization of cultures. Although the Gospel is independent from
any culture, it is capable of infusing all cultures, while never
allowing itself to be subservient to them.[20]
In this sense, the Holy Spirit is also the principal agent of the
inculturation of the Gospel, presiding in a fruitful way at the
dialogue between the Word of God, revealed in Christ, and the
deepest questions which arise among the multitude of human beings
and cultures. In this way, the Pentecost-event continues in history,
in the unity of one and the same faith, enriched by the diversity of
languages and cultures.
7. The communication of religiously significant events and truths
in order that they will be accepted by others is not only in
profound harmony with the human phenomena of dialogue, proclamation
and education, it also corresponds to another important
anthropological fact: the desire, which is proper to the human
person, to have others share in one’s own goods. The acceptance of
the Good News in faith is thus dynamically ordered to such a
communication. The truth which saves one’s life inflames the heart
of the one who has received it with a love of neighbour that
motivates him to pass on to others in freedom what he has freely
been given.
Although non-Christians can be saved through the grace which God
bestows in “ways known to him”,[21]
the Church cannot fail to recognize that such persons are lacking a
tremendous benefit in this world: to know the true face of God and
the friendship of Jesus Christ, God-with-us. Indeed “there is
nothing more beautiful than to be surprised by the Gospel, by the
encounter with Christ. There is nothing more beautiful than to know
him and to speak to others of our friendship with him”.[22]
The revelation of the fundamental truths[23]
about God, about the human person and the world, is a great good for
every human person, while living in darkness without the truths
about ultimate questions is an evil and is often at the root of
suffering and slavery which can at times be grievous. This is why
Saint Paul does not hesitate to describe conversion to the Christian
faith as liberation “from the power of darkness” and entrance into
“the kingdom of his beloved Son in whom we have redemption and the
forgiveness of our sins” (Col 1:13-14). Therefore, fully
belonging to Christ, who is the Truth, and entering the Church do
not lessen human freedom, but rather exalt it and direct it towards
its fulfilment, in a love that is freely given and which overflows
with care for the good of all people. It is an inestimable benefit
to live within the universal embrace of the friends of God which
flows from communion in the life-giving flesh of his Son, to receive
from him the certainty of forgiveness of sins and to live in the
love that is born of faith. The Church wants everyone to share in
these goods so that they may possess the fullness of truth and the
fullness of the means of salvation, in order “to enter into the
freedom of the glory of the children of God” (Rom 8:21).
8. Evangelization also involves a sincere dialogue that seeks to
understand the reasons and feelings of others. Indeed, the heart of
another person can only be approached in freedom, in love and in
dialogue, in such a manner that the word which is spoken is not
simply offered, but also truly witnessed in the hearts of those to
whom it is addressed. This requires taking into account the hopes,
sufferings and concrete situations of those with whom one is in
dialogue. Precisely in this way, people of good will open their
hearts more freely and share their spiritual and religious
experiences in all sincerity. This experience of sharing, a
characteristic of true friendship, is a valuable occasion for
witnessing and for Christian proclamation.
As in any other field of human activity, so too in dialogue on
religious matters, sin can enter in. It may sometimes happen that
such a dialogue is not guided by its natural purpose, but gives way
instead to deception, selfish motives or arrogance, thus failing in
respect for the dignity and religious freedom of the partners in
dialogue. For this reason, “the Church severely prohibits forcing
people to embrace the faith or leading or enticing them by improper
techniques; by the same token, she also strongly defends the right
that no one be deterred from the faith by deplorable ill treatment”.[24]
The primary motive of evangelization is the love of Christ for
the eternal salvation of all. The sole desire of authentic
evangelizers is to bestow freely what they themselves have freely
received: “From the very origins of the Church, the disciples of
Christ strove to convert men to faith in Christ the Lord; not,
however, through coercion or tactics unworthy of the Gospel, but
above all by the power of the word of God”.[25]
The mission of the Apostles and its continuation in the mission of
the early Church remain the foundational model of evangelization for
all time: it is a mission that has often been marked by martyrdom,
as demonstrated by the history of the twentieth century. It is
precisely martyrdom that gives credibility to witnesses, who seek
neither power nor advantage, but instead lay down their lives for
Christ. Before all the world, they display an unarmed strength
brimming with love for all people, which is bestowed on those who
follow Christ unto the total gift of their existence. So it is that
Christians, from the very dawn of Christianity up until our own time
have suffered persecution on account of the Gospel, as Jesus himself
foretold: “If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you” (Jn
15:20).
III. Some ecclesiological implications
9. Since the day of Pentecost, one who fully accepts the faith is
incorporated into the community of believers: “those who received
his word [Peter’s] were baptized and that day about three thousand
people were added to them” (Acts 2:41). Since the beginning,
the Gospel, in the power of the Spirit, is proclaimed to all people
so that they might believe and become disciples of Christ and
members of his Church. In the writings of the Fathers of the Church,
there are constant exhortations to fulfil the mission entrusted by
Christ to his disciples.[26]
Generally, the term conversion is used in reference to
bringing pagans into the Church. However, conversion (metanoia),
in its precisely Christian meaning, signifies a change in thinking
and in acting, as the expression of the new life in Christ
proclaimed by faith: a continuous reform of thought and deeds
directed at an ever more intense identification with Christ (cf.
Gal 2:20), to which the baptized are called before all else.
This is, in the first place, the meaning of the call made by Jesus
himself: “repent and believe in the Gospel” (Mk 1:15; cf.
Mt 4:17).
The Christian spirit has always been animated by a passion to
lead all humanity to Christ in the Church. The incorporation of new
members into the Church is not the expansion of a power-group, but
rather entrance into the network of friendship with Christ which
connects heaven and earth, different continents and ages. It is
entrance into the gift of communion with Christ, which is “new life”
enlivened by charity and the commitment to justice. The Church is
the instrument, “the seed and the beginning”[27]
of the Kingdom of God; she is not a political utopia. She is already
the presence of God in history and she carries in herself the true
future, the definitive future in which God will be “all in all” (1
Cor 15:28); she is a necessary presence, because only God can
bring authentic peace and justice to the world. The Kingdom of God
is not – as some maintain today – a generic reality above all
religious experiences and traditions, to which they tend as a
universal and indistinct communion of all those who seek God, but it
is, before all else, a person with a name and a face: Jesus of
Nazareth, the image of the unseen God.[28]
Therefore, every free movement of the human heart towards God and
towards his kingdom cannot but by its very nature lead to Christ and
be oriented towards entrance into his Church, the efficacious sign
of that Kingdom. The Church, therefore, is the bearer of the
presence of God and thus the instrument of the true humanization of
man and the world. The growth of the Church in history, which
results from missionary activity, is at the service of the presence
of God through his Kingdom: one cannot in fact “detach the
Kingdom from the Church”.[29]
10. However, the Church’s “missionary proclamation is endangered
today by relativistic theories which seek to justify religious
pluralism, not only de facto but also de iure (or in
principle)”.[30] For a
long time, the reason for evangelization has not been clear to many
among the Catholic faithful.[31]
It is even stated that the claim to have received the gift of the
fullness of God’s revelation masks an attitude of intolerance and a
danger to peace.
Those who make such claims are overlooking the fact that the
fullness of the gift of truth, which God makes by revealing himself
to man, respects the freedom which he himself created as an
indelible mark of human nature: a freedom which is not indifference,
but which is rather directed towards truth. This kind of respect is
a requirement of the Catholic faith itself and of the love of
Christ; it is a constitutive element of evangelization and,
therefore, a good which is to be promoted inseparably with the
commitment to making the fullness of salvation, which God offers to
the human race in the Church, known and freely embraced.
Respect for religious freedom[32]
and its promotion “must not in any way make us indifferent towards
truth and goodness. Indeed, love impels the followers of Christ to
proclaim to all the truth which saves”.[33]
Such love is the sign of the authentic presence of the Holy Spirit
who, as the principal agent of evangelization,[34]
never ceases to move people’s hearts when they hear the Gospel, by
opening them to receive it. It is a love which lives in the heart of
the Church and from there, as burning charity, radiates out to the
ends of the earth, as far as the heart of every human being. The
entire heart of man awaits the encounter with Jesus Christ.
Thus one understands the urgency of Christ’s invitation to
evangelization and why it is that the mission entrusted by the Lord
to the Apostles involves all the baptized. The words of Jesus “go
therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the
Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all
that I have commanded you” (Mt 28:19-20), are directed to
everyone in the Church, each according to his own vocation. At the
present time, with so many people in the world living in different
types of desert, above all, in the “desert of God’s darkness,
the emptiness of souls no longer aware of their dignity or the goal
of human life”,[35]
Pope Benedict XVI has recalled to the world that “the Church as a
whole and all her Pastors, like Christ, must set out to lead people
out of the desert, towards the place of life, towards friendship
with the Son of God, towards the One who gives us life, and life in
abundance”.[36] This
apostolic commitment is an inalienable right and duty, an expression
of religious liberty, with its corresponding ethical-social and
ethical-political dimensions.[37]
It is a right which in some parts of the world, unfortunately, has
not yet been recognized and which in others is not respected in
practice.[38]
11. He who announces the Gospel participates in the charity of
Christ, who loved us and gave himself up for us (cf. Eph
5:2); he is his ambassador and he pleads in the name of Christ: let
yourselves to be reconciled with God! (cf. 2 Cor 5:20). It is
a charity which is an expression of the gratitude that flows from
the heart when it opens to the love given in Jesus Christ, that Love
which, as Dante wrote, is displayed throughout the universe.[39]
This explains the ardour, the confidence, and the freedom of speech
(parrhesia) evident in the preaching of the Apostles (cf.
Acts 4:31; 9:27-28; 26:26, etc.) and which Agrippa experienced
when he heard Paul speaking: “You will soon persuade me to become a
Christian!” (Acts 26:28).
Evangelization is not only accomplished through public preaching
of the Gospel nor solely through works of public relevance, but also
by means of personal witness which is always very effective in
spreading the Gospel. Indeed, “side by side with the collective
proclamation of the Gospel, the other form of handing it on, from
person to person, remains valid and important… It must not happen
that the pressing need to proclaim the Good News to the multitudes
should cause us to forget this form of proclamation whereby an
individual’s personal conscience is reached and touched by an
entirely unique word that he receives from someone else”.[40]
In any case, it needs to be remembered that, in transmitting the
Gospel, word and witness of life go together.[41]
Above all, the witness of holiness is necessary, if the light of
truth is to reach all human beings. If the word is contradicted by
behaviour, its acceptance will be difficult. However, even witness
by itself is not enough “because even the finest witness will prove
ineffective in the long run, if it is not explained, justified –
what Peter called ‘giving a reason for the hope that is in you’ (1
Pet 3:15) – and made explicit by a clear and unequivocal
proclamation of the Lord Jesus”.[42]
IV. Some ecumenical implications
12. From its beginnings, the ecumenical movement has been closely
connected with evangelization. Unity, in fact, is the seal of the
credibility of missionary activity and so the Second Vatican Council
noted with regret that the scandal of division “damages the most
sacred cause of preaching”.[43]
Jesus himself, on the night before his death, prayed “that they all
may be one.. so that the world may believe” (Jn 17:21).
The mission of the Church is universal and is not restricted to
specific regions of the earth. Evangelization, however, is
undertaken differently according to the different situations in
which it occurs. In its precise sense, evangelization is the
missio ad gentes directed to those who do not know Christ. In
a wider sense, it is used to describe ordinary pastoral work, while
the phrase “new evangelization” designates pastoral outreach to
those who no longer practice the Christian faith.[44]
In addition, there is evangelization in countries where non-Catholic
Christians live, including those with an ancient Christian tradition
and culture. In this context, what is required is both true respect
for the tradition and spiritual riches of such countries as well as
a sincere spirit of cooperation. Catholics, “avoiding every form of
indifferentism or confusion, as well as senseless rivalry, through a
common profession of faith in God and in Jesus Christ before all
peoples – insofar as this is possible – may collaborate with their
separated brethren in social, cultural, technical and religious
matters in accordance with the Decree on Ecumenism”.[45]
Different dimensions of the work of ecumenism can be
distinguished: above all, there is listening, as a
fundamental condition for any dialogue, then, theological
discussion, in which, by seeking to understand the beliefs,
traditions and convictions of others, agreement can be found, at
times hidden under disagreement. Inseparably united with this is
another essential dimension of the ecumenical commitment: witness
and proclamation of elements which are not particular traditions
or theological subtleties, but which belong rather to the Tradition
of the faith itself.
Ecumenism does not have only an institutional dimension aimed at
“making the partial communion existing between Christians grow
towards full communion in truth and charity”.[46]
It is also the task of every member of the faithful, above all by
means of prayer, penance, study and cooperation. Everywhere and
always, each Catholic has the right and the duty to give the witness
and the full proclamation of his faith. With non-Catholic
Christians, Catholics must enter into a respectful dialogue of
charity and truth, a dialogue which is not only an exchange of
ideas, but also of gifts,[47]
in order that the fullness of the means of salvation can be offered
to one’s partners in dialogue.[48]
In this way, they are led to an ever deeper conversion to Christ.
In this connection, it needs also to be recalled that if a
non-Catholic Christian, for reasons of conscience and having been
convinced of Catholic truth, asks to enter into the full communion
of the Catholic Church, this is to be respected as the work of the
Holy Spirit and as an expression of freedom of conscience and of
religion. In such a case, it would not be a question of proselytism
in the negative sense that has been attributed to this term.[49]
As explicitly recognized in the Decree on Ecumenism of the Second
Vatican Council, “it is evident that the work of preparing and
reconciling those individuals who desire full Catholic communion is
of its nature distinct from ecumenical action, but there is no
opposition between the two, since both proceed from the marvelous
ways of God”.[50]
Therefore, the work of ecumenism does not remove the right or take
away the responsibility of proclaiming in fullness the Catholic
faith to other Christians, who freely wish to receive it.
This perspective naturally requires the avoidance of any undue
pressure: “in spreading religious faith and introducing religious
practices, everyone should refrain at all times from any kind of
action which might seem to suggest coercion or dishonest or improper
persuasion, especially when dealing with poor or uneducated people”.[51]
The witness to the truth does not seek to impose anything by force,
neither by coercive action nor by tactics incompatible with the
Gospel. By definition, the exercise of charity is free.[52]
Love and witnessing to the truth are aimed above all at convincing
others through the power of the word of God (Cf. 1 Cor 2:3-5;
1 Thess 2:3-5).[53]
The Christian mission resides in the power of the Holy Spirit and in
the truth itself which is proclaimed.
V. Conclusion
13. The Church’s commitment to evangelization can never be
lacking, since according to his own promise, the presence of the
Lord Jesus in the power of the Holy Spirit will never be absent from
her: “I am with you always, even until the end of the world” (Mt
28:20). The relativism and irenicism prevalent today in the area of
religion are not valid reasons for failing to respond to the
difficult, but awe-inspiring commitment which belongs to the nature
of the Church herself and is indeed the Church’s “primary task”.[54]
“Caritas Christi urget nos – the love of Christ impels us” (2
Cor 5:14): the lives of innumerable Catholics bear witness to
this truth. Throughout the entire history of the Church, people
motivated by the love of Jesus have undertaken initiatives and works
of every kind in order to proclaim the Gospel to the entire world
and in all sectors of society, as a perennial reminder and
invitation to every Christian generation to fulfill with generosity
the mandate of Christ. Therefore, as Pope Benedict XVI recalls, “the
proclamation of and witness to the Gospel are the first service that
Christians can render to every person and to the entire human race,
called as they are to communicate to all God’s love, which was fully
manifested in Jesus Christ, the one Redeemer of the world”.[55]
The love which comes from God unites us to him and “makes us a ‘we’
which transcends our divisions and makes us one, until in the end
God is ‘all in all’ (1 Cor 15:28)”.[56]
The Sovereign Pontiff Benedict XVI, in the Audience granted to
the undersigned Cardinal Prefect on 6 October 2007, approved the
present Doctrinal Note, adopted in the Ordinary Session of
this Congregation, and ordered its publication.
Rome, from the Offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith, 3 December 2007, Memorial of Saint Francis Xavier, Patron
of the Missions.
William Cardinal Levada
Prefect
Angelo Amato, SDB
Titular Archbishop of Sila
Secretary
NOTES
[1]
John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio (7
December 1990), 47: AAS 83 (1991), 293.
[2]
Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen
gentium, 14; cf. Decree Ad gentes, 7; Decree
Unitatis redintegratio, 3. This teaching does not
contradict the universal salvific will of God, who “desires
that all men be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth”
(1 Tim 2:4); therefore, “it is necessary to keep
these two truths together, namely, the real possibility of
salvation in Christ for all mankind and the necessity of the
Church for salvation” (John Paul II, Encyclical Letter
Redemptoris missio, 9: AAS 83 [1991], 258).
[3]
Cf. John Paul II, Apostolic Letter Novo millennio ineunte
(6 January 2001), 1: AAS 93 (2001), 266.
[4]
Cf. Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii nuntiandi
(8 December 1975), 24: AAS 69 (1976), 22.
[5]
John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio,
46: AAS 83 (1991), 293; cf. Paul VI, Apostolic
Exhortation Evangelii nuntiandi, 53 and 80: AAS
69 (1976), 41-42, 73-74.
[6]
Benedict XVI, Homily at the Mass celebrated at the
outdoor site of the Neue Messe in Munich (10 September
2006): AAS 98 (2006), 710.
[7]
Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, I-II, q. 109,
a.1, ad 1: “any truth, no matter by whom it is spoken, is
from the Holy Spirit”.
[8]
Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio
(14 September 1998), 44: AAS 91 (1999), 40.
[9]
Benedict XVI, Address to the Participants in the
Ecclesial Diocesan Convention of Rome “Family and Christian
community: formation of the person and transmission of the
faith” (6 June 2005): AAS 97 (2005), 816.
[10] John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio,
5: AAS 91 (1999), 9-10.
[11] Ibidem, 31: AAS 91 (1999), 29; cf.
Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et
spes,12.
[12] This right was recognized and affirmed also by the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 (art.
18-19).
[13] John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio,
33: AAS 91 (1999), 31.
[14] Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution
Dei Verbum, 5.
[15] Second Vatican Council, Declaration Dignitatis
humanae, 3.
[17] John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris
missio, 52: AAS 83 (1991), 300.
[18] Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Slavorum
Apostoli (2 June 1985), 18: AAS 77 (1985), 800.
[19] Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution
Dei Verbum, 8.
[20] Cf. Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii
nuntiandi, 19-20: AAS 69 (1976), 18-19.
[21] Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes, 7;
cf. Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 16; Pastoral
Constitution Gaudium et spes, 22.
[22] Benedict XVI, Homily at the Mass for the
Inauguration of the Pontificate (24 April 2005): AAS
97 (2005), 711.
[23] Cf. First Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution
Dei Filius, 2: “It is indeed thanks to this divine
revelation, that those matters concerning God, which are not
of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in
the present condition of the human race, be known by
everyone without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no
admixture of error (cf. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa
Theologiae, I, q.1, a.1)” (DH 3005).
[24] Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes,
13.
[25] Second Vatican Council, Declaration Dignitatis
humanae, 11.
[26] Cf., for example, Clement of Alexandria,
Protrepticus (Exhortation to the Greeks), IX, 87,
3-4 (Sources Chrétiennes 2:154-155); Saint Augustine, Sermo
14D [=352 A], 3 (Nuova Biblioteca Agostiniana,
XXXV/1, 269-271).
[27] Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution
Lumen gentium, 5.
[28] Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris
missio, 18: AAS 83 (1991), 265-266: “If the
kingdom is separated from Jesus, it is no longer the kingdom
of God which he revealed. The result is a distortion of the
meaning of the kingdom, which runs the risk of being
transformed into a purely human or ideological goal, and a
distortion of the identity of Christ, who no longer appears
as the Lord to whom everything must one day be subjected
(cf. 1 Cor 15:27)”.
[29] John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris
missio, 18: AAS 83 (1991), 266. On the
relationship between Christ and the Kingdom, cf. also
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Declaration
Dominus Iesus (6 August 2000), 18-19: AAS
92 (2000), 759-761.
[30] Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,
Declaration Dominus Iesus, 4: AAS 92 (2000),
744.
[31] Cf. Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii
nuntiandi, 80: AAS 69 (1976), 73: “Besides, it is
added, why proclaim the Gospel when the whole world is saved
by uprightness of heart? We know likewise that the world and
history are filled with "seeds of the Word"; is it not
therefore an illusion to claim to bring the Gospel where it
already exists in the seeds that the Lord Himself has sown?”
[32] Cf. Benedict XVI, Address to the Roman Curia
offering Christmas Greetings (22 December 2005): AAS
98 (2006), 50: “…if religious freedom were to be considered
an expression of the human inability to discover the truth
and thus become a canonization of relativism, then this
social and historical necessity is raised inappropriately to
the metaphysical level and thus stripped of its true
meaning. Consequently, it cannot be accepted by those who
believe that the human person is capable of knowing the
truth about God and, on the basis of the inner dignity of
the truth, is bound to this knowledge. It is quite
different, on the other hand, to perceive religious freedom
as a need that derives from human coexistence, or indeed, as
an intrinsic consequence of the truth that cannot be
externally imposed but that the person must adopt only
through the process of conviction”.
[33] Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution
Gaudium et spes, 28; cf. Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation
Evangelii nuntiandi, 24: AAS 69 (1976), 21-22.
[34] Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris
missio, 21-30: AAS 83 (1991), 268-276.
[35] Benedict XVI, Homily at the Mass for the
Inauguration of the Pontificate (24 April 2005): AAS
97 (2005), 710.
[37] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Declaration
Dignitatis humanae, 6.
[38] Indeed, where the right to religious freedom is
recognized, the right to share one’s own convictions with
others in full respect for their consciences is usually
recognized as well; this sharing is aimed at having others
enter one’s own religious community and is an established
right in numerous legal systems, with a well-developed
jurisprudence.
[39] Cf. Dante Alighieri, La Divina Commedia:
Paradiso, 33:87: che per l’universo si squaderna.
[40] Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii
nuntiandi, 46: AAS 69 (1976), 36.
[41] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution
Lumen gentium, 35.
[42] Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii
nuntiandi, 22: AAS 69 (1976), 20.
[43] Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis
redintegratio, 1; cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter
Redemptoris missio, 1 and 50: AAS 83 (1991), 249,
297.
[44] Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Redemptoris
missio, 34: AAS 83 (1991), 279-280.
[45] Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes,
15.
[46] John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Ut unum sint
(25 May 1995), 14: AAS 87 (1995), 929.
[47] Cf. ibidem, 28: AAS 87 (1995), 939.
[48] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis
redintegratio, 3 and 5.
[49] The term proselytism originated in the
context of Judaism, in which the term proselyte
referred to someone who, coming from the gentiles, had
passed into the Chosen People. So too, in the Christian
context, the term proselytism was often used as a synonym
for missionary activity. More recently, however, the term
has taken on a negative connotation, to mean the promotion
of a religion by using means, and for motives, contrary to
the spirit of the Gospel; that is, which do not safeguard
the freedom and dignity of the human person. It is in this
sense that the term proselytism is understood in the context
of the ecumenical movement: cf. The Joint Working Group
between the Catholic Church and the World Council of
Churches, “The Challenge of Proselytism and the Calling
to Common Witness” (1995).
[50] Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis
redintegratio, 4.
[51] Second Vatican Council, Declaration Dignitatis
humanae, 4.
[52] Cf. Benedict XVI, Encyclical Letter Deus caritas
est (25 December 2005), 31 c: AAS 98 (2006), 245.
[53] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Declaration
Dignitatis humanae, 11.
[54] Benedict XVI, Homily during the visit to the
Basilica of Saint Paul outside the Walls (25 April
2005): AAS 97 (2005), 745.
[55] Benedict XVI, Address to the participants in the
International Conference on the 40th anniversary
of the conciliar Decree “Ad gentes” (11 March 2006):
AAS 98 (2006), 334.
[56] Benedict XVI, Encyclical Letter Deus caritas est,
18: AAS 98 (2006), 232.
|