May 7, 2004
Senator John Kerry makes a strong distinction
between his personal life as a Catholic and his public life as a
politician. He cites the separation of church and state as the rationale
for this duality.
I think Kerry is right about the separation of church and state in
terms of one not trying to dominate the other or one not interfering with
the legitimate roles of the other. But when it comes to moral issues that
touch upon basic human rights, such as the right to life, then we
Catholics are not free to go against our consciences formed by our
Catholic faith. We cannot separate what we believe privately about human
life from our public statements and positions. Otherwise we contradict
John Kerry claims that he accepts the teaching of the church about the
sacredness of all human life
this is his personal belief and stance. But he thinks that, in a
pluralistic society like ours, public policy should support the right of
women to make their own decisions about whether to have an abortion or
not. Therefore he supports legislation and laws supporting abortion, even
the barbarism of late-term abortion. Somehow the Catholic conscience about
supporting the rights of pre-born infants to life does not register in his
public persona. It is fundamentally dishonest to claim one’s conscience is
opposed to abortion and then support abortion as public policy.
Church teaching forms our consciences
Our Catholic tradition and teaching makes it clear that we cannot
support privately or publicly any human behavior which is immoral, and in
the case of deliberate abortion, seriously sinful. By publicly supporting
immoral acts, John Kerry has to be acting against his conscience if it is
formed by Catholic teaching. We cannot act against our conscience and then
declare that we are faithful to the church which helped form our
conscience. This is a contradiction.
The recent declaration from the Vatican about Catholic politicians
makes this important point
Catholics are not free, if they are faithful to the Church, to take public
stands against church teaching on essential issues. If they do so, they
are no longer faithful to the church.
My past stand against public dissent
In the past I have reminded Catholic politicians who are Democrats in
this archdiocese that they have an obligation to be pro-life in their
public statements and their voting record. They have an obligation in
conscience to work actively against their party’s platform and policies
that support abortion. If they are not willing to do this, then they may
not serve in any ministry or office in the archdiocese.
I have also reminded Catholic politicians who are Republicans in the
archdiocese that they have an obligation in conscience to be pro-life in
all matters, from beginning human life to natural death. They must
actively support pro-life policies of their party and resist all efforts
to promote anti-life agendas. If any publicly disagree with church
teachings about the sacredness of all human life, they may not serve in
any ministry or office in the archdiocese.
My policy is based on Catholic theology
If a Catholic politician in this archdiocese is reported to me as being
publicly supportive of abortion (or not supportive of other human life
issues) then I will visit with that person and explain the position of the
church. Individual pastors should be willing to do the same. Public
dissent against church teaching is a serious matter for Catholics and a
serious matter for the one who dissents. Hopefully, through dialogue, we
could come to some agreement about avoiding public statements and public
stands contrary to Church teaching. It may be that I or one of our pastors
will have to inform a certain person that such continuing public dissent
will be incompatible with continuing to receive the Eucharist. This will
remain a private matter between that person and me or one of our pastors.
I will not make a public statement about refusing Holy Communion to
certain Catholics in this archdiocese. This also applies to any Catholic
candidates coming from outside Northeast Nebraska.
If full communion with the church on all matters of faith is the only
criterion for Catholics to be able to receive the Eucharist, then I would
have to challenge a considerable number of people in the archdiocese about
receiving the Eucharist regularly. My pastoral task is to try to bring
people to an understanding and appreciation of church teaching so that
they can embrace it with a good conscience. I will keep at the task now
and in the future.
The candidacy of John Kerry
I regret that John Kerry insists on giving public support to the
abortion industry that promotes a culture of death in this country. He
needs to be challenged by Catholics everywhere in this country. Because of
the scandal his position is causing for the church, he should refrain from
receiving the Eucharist in public liturgies.
Reprinted with permission of The Catholic Voice