To Propose the Truth: The Catholic Moment Requires Five Transformations
TO PROPOSE THE TRUTH
THE CATHOLIC MOMENT REQUIRES FIVE TRANSFORMATIONS
Richard John Neuhaus
SEVEN YEARS AGO in
The Catholic Church offers the word of truth and hope also for the family.
The Church has a doctrine of the faith, a truth divinely inspired and humanly informed, regarding marriage and the family. With this truth she challenges the Catholic faithful and the world. Families that meet the challenge of faith are equipped to meet the many other challenges that will surely come their way. With faith, everything is possible; without it, all foundations rest upon shifting sand. In reflecting on family life, we are haunted by the question of Our Lord, "When the son of man returns, will he find faith on earth?" (Luke I8:8). It is no secret that the Church's teaching on sexuality, marriage, and family is ignored by many Catholics and is derided by the world. This is not to say that the teaching is rejected, for to be rejected it must be understood, and to be understood it must be taught. All too frequently the Church's truth about marriage and the family is not taught-not confidently, not persistently, not winsomely, not with conviction.
IT IS NOT TAUGHT, in part, because in our culture it is frequently derided and distorted. The Archbishop of Baltimore has recently addressed with refreshing candor the ways in which the communications media are captive to a twisted version of "the Catholic story." A central component of that story is the claim that most Catholics dissent from the Church's teaching on sexuality and family life. But of course that claim is false. In order to dissent one must know what one is dissenting from. Yet that claim of the media, repeated often enough, has an intimidating and inhibiting effect upon the Catholic people, upon catechists, upon priests, and, dare I say, even upon some bishops. Repeated often enough-and it is repeated incessantly-it insinuates the suspicion that, in this vital area of human life, the effective teaching of Catholic doctrine is a losing cause, perhaps already a lost cause.
Our situation is best described not in terms of dissent but of widespread
ignorance and confusion. Admittedly, the problem is compounded by the fact
that there are some who do dissent-theologians and others who are not
above employing ignorance and confusion to advance their own views. One
speaks of this with sorrow and hesitation, and yet speak of it we must. It
is not a matter of making allegations, for those responsible could hardly
be more public in identifying their views and declaring their purposes.
Theirs is not the quiet and conscientious dissent of scholarly service to
the Church; rather, it is all too often a dissent of bitter opposition and
angry alienation. It is a dissent that confuses opinion research with the
This is the phenomenon addressed, no doubt with a heavy heart, by the Holy
Father in his recent encyclical,
The Church has not the time, the world has not the time, countless men and women eager to live the adventure to holiness have not the time for interminable intramural disputes that obscure the splendor of Christian truth about marriage and the family. It is time to move on.
THE SPRINGTIME OF PROPHETIC HUMANISM
If we have the will and the wit for it, if we have the faith for it, a world that has lost its way is waiting to receive the gift of the Church, which is the good news of the One who is the Way. A world that has come to doubt the very existence of truth waits to hear from the One who is the Truth. A world falling headlong into the culture of death looks with desperate hope to the One who said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). If we have the will and the wit for it, if we have the faith for it, this is our moment in The Catholic Moment which is every moment in time, and is most certainly this moment in time.
At the edge of the Third Millennium we stand amidst the rubble of the
collapsed delusions of a modernity that sought freedom and life by
liberating itself from the author and end of life. Many of the best and
the brightest announced the death of God; what appeared, is the death of
man. It is for man-for the
There is reason to hope that, after the long winter of its jaded discontent, the modern world may be entering a season of greater receptivity to the truth that the Church has to offer. The great British novelist Anthony Burgess sometimes described himself as an apostate Catholic. Shortly before he died, he wrote, "My apostasy had never been perfect. I am still capable of moaning and breast-beating at my defection from, as I recognize it, the only system that makes spiritual and intellectual sense." Like the apostasy of Mr. Burgess, the apostasy of our world from Christian truth is by no means perfect. The Holy Father speaks frequently of the Third Millennium as a springtime "-a springtime of evangelization, a springtime of ecumenism, a springtime of faith. He cannot know and we cannot know what is in store for us, but we can be prepared. We can be prepared to be surprised by a time in which thoughtful men and women will give a new hearing to the only truth that "makes spiritual and intellectual sense."
With respect to the family or anything else, one runs a risk by suggesting that the world needs to hear, whether it knows it or not, the truth that the Church has to offer. One runs the risk of, among other things, being accused of triumphalism. If the alternative to triumphalism is defeatism, we should not fear to be known as triumphalists. But the only triumph that we seek is the triumph already secured by the One who came "not to be served but to serve" (Matthew 20:28). Springtime may not produce immediate results, indeed the result may seem like failure. But we know that "unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit" (John 12:24). And there were seeds sown long ago in cultures once called Christian, seeds that may again be breaking through the earth that has for so long been hard frozen under the ice of indifference and unbelief. I take it that this is what the Holy Father means when he so earnestly calls us to the tasks of "re-evangelization." To re-evangelize-to sow anew, and to nurture to new life what is already there but has for so long been stifled and stunted by neglect and faithless distraction.
THE FIVE TRANSFORMATIONS
If, in anticipating the springtime of the Third Millennium, we are to sow
more confidently and effectively, if our sowing is to transform the world
(and we are called to nothing less than that!), we ourselves must be
transformed. Permit me to suggest five transformations of pressing
urgency. First, we need to cultivate the courage to be counter-cultural.
Second, we need to appropriate more fully the gift of Peter among us, a
gift luminously exemplified by this pontificate. Third, we need to
recognize that the Church's teaching about sexuality, marriage, and family
has a coherent structure and is all of a piece. Fourth, we need more fully
to honor marriage as a Christian vocation. Fifth, we need an intensified
commitment to what
First, then, whether "in season or out of season," those who propose Christian truth must always cultivate the courage to be counter-cultural. Until Our Lord returns in glory, we will be wrestling with what it means to be in the world but not of the world. The truth that the Church proposes is for the world, but the Church will inevitably appear to be against the world when the world resists the truth about itself. The necessary posture of prophetic humanism, therefore, is one of being against the world for the world. Moreover, cultural resistance to the truth has more formidable sources. With Saint Paul, we never forget that "We are not contending against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places" (Ephesians 6:12).
Especially in North America, some fear that the call to counter-cultural courage is an invitation to return to the "ghetto Catholicism" of an earlier era, but that is not the case. Sociologically speaking, immigrant Catholicism was not so much counter-cultural as subcultural. The true progression is from subcultural striving to cultural success to counter-cultural challenge and transformation. The remarkable cultural success of American Catholics in the last half century is a tragic failure if it means that now Catholics are just like everybody else. Real success is marked by the confidence and courage to challenge the culture of which we are securely part. Or we might put it this way: there is a crucial difference between being American Catholics and being Catholic Americans. We are constantly told that there is a distinctively American way of being Catholic. The course of counter-cultural courage is to demonstrate that there is a distinctively Catholic way of being American. The Catholic Moment happens when American Catholics dare to be Catholic Americans.
An earlier generation prided itself on being accepted by American culture,
and we should honor what was honorable in that achievement. But surely our
task if to prepare a generation that will dare to transform American
culture. Catholicism is no longer a suppliant, standing hat in hand before
our cultural betters. We are full participants who unhesitatingly accept
our responsibility to remedy a culture that is descending into decadence
and disarray. The remedy begins with each person who hears and responds to
the radical call to holiness in accord with moral truth. This is the
message of
This is the message of
The second needed transformation is for Catholics in America to more fully appropriate the gift of Peter among us as exemplified by this pontificate. For more than fifteen years now, we have been graced with one of the most determined and vigorous teaching pontificates in the two-thousand-year history of the Church. We have witnessed before our eyes the vibrant, Spirit-guided development of doctrine that John Henry Cardinal Newman celebrated as a unique strength of the Catholic Church. And yet we must confess that this gift has not been truly received among us. The teaching of this pontificate has hardly begun to penetrate the institutions and practices of American Catholicism. In large sectors of the theological, administrative, educational, and catechetical establishments, this pontificate is viewed not as a gift but as an aberration-as a temporary interruption of the "progressive" march of intellectual and moral accommodation to the spirit of the times.
BUT THIS, too, may be changing. A younger generation is little interested in the tired ecclesiastical politics of the last quarter century, the endless wrangling of conservative versus liberal, progressive versus traditionalist, liberationist versus magisterial. They want to get on with the bracing adventure of being authentically and distinctively Catholic. We are told that seminarians today are timorous, dull, and conformist; and no doubt there are some who fit that description. There is reason to hope, however, that there are many more who are eager to be enlisted in a great cause, to serve the greatest of causes-the salvation of souls, the daring of discipleship, the anticipation of the coming of the Kingdom of God. Pray that we will be worthy of a new generation of priests who will settle for nothing less.
Moreover, we will soon have, at long last, the
CATHOLIC TEACHING ON SEX
To cultivate the courage to be counter-cultural, and to appropriate the
gift of this pontificate, a third transformation is needed: To recognize
that the Church's teaching on sexuality, marriage, and family is all of a
piece. Here it is necessary to speak of
Maybe people are led to think, the Church will change its position on this
or that or the other thing. The "maybes" of conditionality produce
conditional Catholics, and conditional Catholics are deprived of the joy
of unqualified discipleship. We are not dealing here with inconvenient
rules of the Church that can be changed at will. Again
Of course there are pastoral problems, very difficult problems, in connection with this truth. The Church is infinitely patient and understanding toward those who struggle with the demands of the truth; but the Church's love is never the love that deceives by disguising the truth. The readiness to forgive is ever greater than the capacity to sin; and no one has fallen away who, having fallen, seeks the grace to rise and walk again. The People of God look more often like a bedraggled band of stumblers than a spit-and-polish company on parade, but the way of discipleship is no less splendid for that. It is the splendor of truth that calls us, and truth will not let us go.
Here, too, the teaching of the recent encyclical applies: "Commandments must not be understood as a minimum limit not to be gone beyond, but rather as a path involving a moral and spiritual journey toward perfection, at the heart of which is love." It is pitifully inadequate simply to teach that artificial contraception is wrong. In the Church's teaching, every "no" is premised upon a prior and greater "yes." All too often that "yes" has not been heard, and it has not been heard because it has not been taught. The Church's teaching is to be presented not as a prohibition but as an invitation, an invitation to what Saint Paul proposed as the "more excellent way" (I Corinthians 12:31)-the way of love. Only in the light of that more excellent way does the prohibition make sense. Only those who know what they are called to be can understand the commandments about what they are to do, and not to do.
THE VOCATION TO HOLINESS
The way of love is openness to the other, and openness to life. It is the uncompromised gift of the self to the other and, ultimately, to God. Against a widespread dualism that views the body as instrumental to the self, the way of love knows that the body is integral to the self. Against a sexuality in which women become objects for the satisfaction of desire, the way of love joins two persons in mutual respect and mutual duty, in which sacred bond respect turns to reverence and duty to delight. Against a culture in which sex is trivialized and degraded, the way of love invites eros to participate in nothing less than the drama of salvation.
There are many, also in the Church, who dismiss this way of love as an impossible ideal. Married couples beyond numbering who live this way of love tell us otherwise. They testify that it is ideal and it is possible. We need more effectively to enlist their testimony in advancing the authentic sexual revolution, which is the liberation of sexuality from bondage to fear of life and bondage to the self. This, too, may be part of the springtime that we are called to anticipate: that a world exhausted and disillusioned by the frenzied demands of disordered desire may be ready, even eager, to hear the truth about love. But ready or not, it is the truth that we are commissioned to propose.
The fourth transformation: We need more convincingly to honor marriage and family as Christian vocation. In popular teaching and piety, we have yet to overcome the false pitting of celibacy against marriage. We speak of "vocations" to the priestly and religious life in a way that can obscure the truth that every Christian has a radical vocation to holiness. In agreement with a venerable tradition, we may want to say that celibacy is a "superior" calling, but we must never do so in a way that suggests that married Christians have settled for the second best. For all Christians, the greatest vocation is the vocation that is truly theirs. I expect that this truth would be more convincingly communicated were the Church to raise to the honor of the altar more Christians who exemplified outstanding holiness in their vocation as mothers, fathers, husbands, and wives. The Catholic Church has a gift for eliciting and celebrating the extraordinary in the ordinary. With respect to marriage and the family, we might do that more effectively if we had more married saints, formally acknowledged as such.
For compelling reasons-reasons freshly articulated in this pontificate-celibacy will, I believe, continue to be the norm for priests of the Latin Rite. A renewed accent on marriage as a vocation to holiness is not in tension with the vocation to priestly celibacy. On the contrary, as every Catholic is challenged to discern the radical call to live in the splendor of truth, I believe that we will experience a great increase both in vocations to the priesthood and in families that will settle for nothing less than the adventure that Saint Paul describes as "being changed into his likeness from glory to glory" (II Corinthians 3: 18 ).
Fifth and finally, we need a renewed commitment to what
Family rights presuppose the most primordial of rights, the right to life. To strike at the transmission of life is to strike at the heart of the family. Here, however inadequately, the Catholic Church already has had a transformative influence on American culture. Although today, thank God, we have many allies, especially among Evangelical Protestants, for a long time Catholics stood almost alone in the witness for life. Without the Catholic Church there would be no pro-life movement. The proponents of abortion, euthanasia, population control, and genetic engineering are correct in viewing the Catholic Church as the chief obstacle to their ambitions. We earnestly pray that one day they may be persuaded to be our friends, but until then we wear their enmity as a badge of honor.
We will not rest, nor will we give others rest, until every unborn child is a child protected in law and welcomed in life. We do not deceive ourselves about the encircling gloom of the culture of death. Perhaps the darkness will grow still deeper, but we will not despair. We have not the right to despair, and, finally, we have not the reason to despair. For we know that the light of life shines in the darkness "and the darkness has not overcome it" (John 1:5). The darkness shall never overcome it. Never. Never.
And now I have gone on too long. "Humanity's passage to the future is through the family." The prophetic humanism of this Pope and this Church proposes to the Catholic people and to the world how that future can be lived with moral dignity and grandeur. We do not know how this proposal will be received, but we will persist in proposing it "in season and out of season." At the edge of the Third Millennium maybe the springtime is at hand; maybe the long dark winter has just begun. We do not know. We do not need to know. God knows.
We do know this: Now is the time of our testing. And it is the time of our
splendor in contending for the splendor of the truth. If we have the will
and the wit for it. If we have the faith for it.
------------------
Richard John Neuhaus is president of the Institute on Religion and Family
Life and editor-in-chief of
------------------------------------------------------------------- The electronic form of this document is copyrighted. Copyright (c) Trinity Communications 1994. Provided courtesy of:
The Catholic Resource Network Trinity Communications PO Box 3610 Manassas, VA 22110 Voice: 703-791-2576 Fax: 703-791-4250 Data: 703-791-4336
The Catholic Resource Network is a Catholic online information and service system. To browse CRNET or join, set your modem to 8 data bits, 1 stop bit and no parity, and call 1-703-791-4336. -------------------------------------------------------------------